The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of two treatment strategies for fatigue and disabilities in QFS: long term treatment with doxycycline or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
Q fever fatigue syndrome (QFS) is one of the most frequent sequelae of Q fever, and constitutes a significant problem in the current outbreak of Q fever. QFS leads to substantial morbidity and has a high socio-economic burden, related to increased use of healthcare facilities and absence from work. It is envisaged that over 750 patients will become chronically fatigued due to Q fever in The Netherlands (20% of 4000 patients from 2007 until now). Although the outbreak appears to diminish, it is expected that Q fever will remain an endemic disease, and therefore this number will continue to grow. A vast medical consumption can be anticipated, stressing the need for an accessible and effective intervention and clear treatment guidelines. The study will contribute to a better understanding of effective treatment of QFS, providing evidence-based guidelines for general practitioners and medical specialists.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
156
CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention of 12 sessions during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Checklist Individual Strength (CIS)
The primary outcome measure is the fatigue severity measured by the subscale fatigue severity (8 items, 7-point Likert Scale) of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS questionnaire) with a severity range from 8-56. High scores indicate a high level of fatigue. Patients with a cut-off score of ≥35 are classified as severely fatigued.
Time frame: 24 weeks after start of treatment
Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) Total Score
Level of functional impairment measured with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The SIP is an instrument that is used to gauge sickness-related dysfunction. The weighted total score on eight subscales of the SIP8 (SIP8 total score) will be used to assess functional disability in all domains of functioning (range 0-5799). A higher score indicates higher levels of functional impairment. A score of 450 or higher on the SIP is defined as being significant disabled because of fatigue.
Time frame: 24 weeks after start of treatment
Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90)
The total score of the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90) measures the level of psychological distress. The SCL90 consists of 90 items scored on a 5-point scale. Scores range from 90 to 450. A low total score reflects high psychological well-being. The SCL-90 is a reliable and valid instrument.
Time frame: 24 weeks after start of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.