The aim of the study is to compare, in patients with acute respiratory failure/acute lung injury the efficacy of three different methods of oxygenation to prevent endotracheal intubation : 1. conventional oxygen therapy (O2 conventional) 2. high flow nasal oxygen therapy (O2-HFN) 3. association of high flow nasal oxygen therapy with non invasive positive pressure ventilation (O2-HFN/NPPV).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
313
standard low flow therapy
The patient will receive high flow nasal of humidified oxygen, set between 30 to 50 l/min. The inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 \>92%.
The patient will receive successively in a day NPPV and O2-HFN. The NPPV will be applied with an airway humidification achieved by using a heated humidifier and a facial mask adapted to the morphology of the patient. The settings will be adjusted as follow : an inspiratory pressure between 6 to 14 cmH2O, in order to obtain a tidal volume between 7 to 10 ml/kg of predicted weight, a positive expiratory pressure between 0 to 10 cmH2O in order to obtain a SpO2 \>92% with the minimal FiO2.
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers, France
To compare the number of patients in each group who require endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation
Time frame: at day 28
mechanical ventilation-free to day 28
Time frame: 28 days
ICU morbidity
Time frame: at day 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.