Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT in the treatment of locally recurrent HCC after initial TACE. Secondary Objectives: 1. To determine the progression-free survival of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT 2. To determine the overall survival of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT for locally recurrent HCC 3. To determine the toxicities associated with TACE or CyberKnife SBRT for the treatment of recurrent HCC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Freedom from local progression at 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Progression-free survival
Time frame: at 6, 12 and 18 months
Overall survival
Time frame: at 6, 12, 18 months and up to 3 years
Serum AFP levels
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Standard of Care