This study by Aptalis (formerly Axcan) assesses the efficacy and safety of Panzytrat® 25,000 compared to Kreon® 25,000 in the control of steatorrhea in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI).
This is an open-label, Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, two-period cross-over study to compare the efficacy and safety of Panzytrat® 25,000 to Kreon® 25,000 in participants aged 7 years and older suffering from CF and EPI. The study consists of a qualification phase (5 to 15 days); two treatment periods of 14 days each (plus a 3-day window if needed) and a 3-day stool collection will be performed from Days 12 to 15. A safety follow-up phone call will be arranged 7-10 days after completion of the treatment phase or after an early discontinuation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
87
Panzytrat® 25,000 capsule will be given orally daily at a stabilized dose, as per investigator's discretion, for 14 days. Stabilized dose for a participant will be the optimal dose determined during a qualification phase that precedes the first treatment period and will be based upon the participant's usual lipase and lipid intake. Total dose will not exceed 10,000 European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.) units lipase/kilogram (kg) body weight/day in either first treatment period or second treatment period.
Kreon® 25,000 capsule will be given orally daily at a stabilized dose, as per investigator's discretion, for 14 days. Stabilized dose for a participant will be the optimal dose determined during a qualification phase that precedes the first treatment period and will be based upon the participant's usual lipase and lipid intake. Total dose will not exceed 10,000 Ph.Eur. units lipase/kg body weight/day in either first treatment period or second treatment period.
Klinikum-Bochum
Bochum, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany
Percent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA)
Percent CFA was calculated as (\[fat intake - fat excretion\]/fat intake)\*100, determined in the stools which were collected over a 3-day period (Day 12 to morning of Day 15) during each treatment period. Least squares mean percent (%) CFA was calculated for Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods. Percent CFA was based on log transformed data.
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Mean Daily Number of Stools
Mean daily number of stools of each participant was calculated from frequency of stools by the participant per day. Mean daily number of stools during the collection period (Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods) for total participants was summarized.
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Percentage of Stools With Normal Consistency
Normal consistency of stool was defined as formed hard, normal or soft stool and abnormal consistency was defined as loose and unformed, liquid stool and diarrhea. Percentage of stools with normal consistency of each participant was calculated as the number of stools with normal consistency relative to the total number of stools during the collection period. Mean percentage of stool with normal consistency during the collection period (Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods) for total participants was summarized.
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Total Weight of Stools
Mean total weight of stools was calculated for Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods.
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Mean Weight Per Stool Sample
Mean weight per stool sample was calculated for Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Jena University Hospital, Universitaetsklinikum Jena
Jena, Germany
Klinikum der Universitat Munchen Medizinische Klinik-Innenstadt
München, Germany
University Children's Clinic Tubingen
Tübingen, Germany
Specjalistyczny Zespół Opieki Zdrowotnej nad Matką i Dzieckiem Poradnia Leczenia Mukowiscydozy
Gdansk, Poland
Wojewodzki Specjalistityczny Szpital Dziect Im Sw Ludwika
Krakow, Poland
Dziecięcy Szpital Kliniczny im. Prof. Antoniego Gębali
Lublin, Poland
Szpital Kliniczny im Karola Jonschera
Poznan, Poland
...and 3 more locations
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Relative Frequency of Days With Abdominal Symptoms
Abdominal symptoms included abdominal pain and flatulence. Symptoms were classified by severity as mild (no impairment of daily activities), moderate (slight impairment of daily activities), or severe (unable to perform daily activities). For each type of abdominal symptom, the relative frequency of days with the symptom for each participant in a treatment period was calculated as the number of days in which the symptom was reported divided by the total number of days in which the abdominal symptom case report form (CRF) was completed. Mean relative frequency of days with abdominal symptoms was calculated during each treatment period (Day 1 to Day 15).
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Distension
Abdominal distension is a sense of increased abdominal pressure by the participant that involves an actual measurable change in the circumference of a participant's abdomen on physical examination. Percentage of participants with abdominal distension was calculated for each treatment period (Day 1 to Day 15).
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Percent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA) Based on Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
Percent CFA was calculated as (\[fat intake - fat excretion\]/fat intake)\*100, determined in the stools which were collected over a 3-day period (Day 12 to morning of Day 15) during each treatment period. Least squares mean percent (%) CFA was calculated for Day 12 to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods. Percent CFA was based on log transformed data. Percent CFA was calculated separately for participants who used and did not use acid suppressing therapy (PPIs) during the study.
Time frame: Day 12 up to Day 15 in first and second treatment periods
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence regardless of its causal relationship to study drug. A TEAE was defined as any event not present prior to exposure to study drug or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to test drug. A SAE was defined as any event that results in death, is immediately life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is assessed as medically important.
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose
Nutritional Status as Assessed by Body Weight
Mean body weight was calculated at end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods).
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods) or early discontinuation
Nutritional Status as Assessed by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Nutritional status of participants was assessed by determining their BMI. BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) by square of height in meter (m). Mean BMI was calculated at end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods).
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods) or early discontinuation
Nutritional Status as Assessed by Electrolytes Level
Nutritional status of participants was assessed by determining their electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride) level. Mean electrolytes level was calculated at end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods).
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods) or early discontinuation
Nutritional Status as Assessed by Albumin, Serum Transferrin and Hemoglobin Level
Nutritional status of participants was assessed by determining their albumin, serum transferrin and hemoglobin level. Mean albumin, serum transferrin and hemoglobin level was calculated at end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods).
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods) or early discontinuation
Nutritional Status as Assessed by Hematocrit Level
Nutritional status of participants was assessed by determining their hematocrit level. Mean hematocrit level was calculated at end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods).
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (within 3 days after Day 15 of first and second treatment periods) or early discontinuation