Intima-Medial Thickness Guidance of Primary Prevention in Relatives of Patients With Early onSet Atherosclerosis

Overview

The primary objective of this study is, to instigate a reduction in atherosclerotic burden within the carotid arteries in the intervention group compared to the control group and to demonstrate parallel improvements in cardiovascular and overall health status relative to usual care

Individuals at intermediate risk account for a large proportion of patients presenting with atherosclerotic events. The barriers to reducing this problem relate to the expense of an unselective primary prevention strategy among a group where the majority will not have events, as well as the difficulty of getting apparently well subjects to adhere to lifestyle and pharmacologic management. An outcome-based study would require large numbers and would be unlikely to be funded without proof of concept. CIMT will be used as a validated surrogate of atherosclerotic status and future cardiovascular events in this study. As such, this study will use CIMT (as both a delineator of risk and in the primary endpoint), a marker of atherosclerotic burden (the disease process rather than a surrogate), to address the unresolved issue about how to most efficiently manage intermediate risk subjects with a family history of premature atherosclerosis by combining better selection of such individuals for active treatment and recommended lifestyle changes with a DMP strategy to optimise their successful application in the longer-term. The Intima-Media thickness guidance of Primary prevention in Relatives of individuals with Early onSet atherosclerosiS (IMPRESS) Study will test the following null hypothesis: In intermediate risk, first-degree relatives (i.e. mother, father, brother or sister) of individuals with premature atherosclerosis, a CIMT-targeted DMP for primary prevention (the IMPRESS intervention) incorporating more intensive non-pharmacological and pharmacological management, provides no better reduction of atherosclerotic burden (as determined by the change in CIMT from baseline to follow-up completion) than usual health care management during three years follow-up. Study Design The study hypotheses will be examined via a randomised controlled primary prevention/intervention trial comparing an individualised DMP with usual clinical care of middle-aged (40-65 years old) subjects who have a family history of premature cardiovascular disease and are determined to be at intermediate risk for a cardiovascular event within the next 5 years7, 22. Study Centres As a multicentre study, participants will be recruited from three centres: * Princess Alexandra Hospital (Brisbane, Australia): responsible site investigator Associate Professor Karam Kostner * Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute/ The Alfred Hospital (Melbourne, Australia): responsible site investigator Dr Melinda Carrington * National University Health System and Novena Heart Centre (Singapore): responsible site investigator Professor Desley Hegney Participants This study will be conducted in a group of 40-65 year old adults. IMPRESS Study will test the following null hypothesis: In intermediate risk, first-degree relatives (i.e. mother, father, brother or sister) of individuals with premature atherosclerosis, a CIMT-targeted DMP for primary prevention (the IMPRESS intervention) incorporating more intensive non-pharmacological and pharmacological management, provides no better reduction of atherosclerotic burden (as determined by the change in CIMT from baseline to follow-up completion) than usual health care management during three years follow-up. Primary End-Point Consistent with the study hypothesis, the primary study end-point is change in CIMT from baseline to three years, as determined by a blinded core laboratory and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis according to random study group allocation. Secondary End-Points The secondary endpoints are change from baseline to three years in the following variables: i) Plaque length (carotid artery) ii) Internal CIMT iii) General health and well being (as measured by the SF-12 18 and EQ-5D 19) iv) Mental health (as determined by the Arrol 20 +/- CESD 21) v) Health care costs vi) Modifiable risk factors for atherosclerotic disease other than diabetes ( i.e. smoking, dyslipidaemia, obesity and hypertension) vii) Absolute cardiovascular risk profile 22 and risk of diabetes (as determined by the Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool \[AUSDRISK\]) Score 23) viii) Diabetic status (as determined by fasting glucose) ix) All-cause mortality/ cardiovascular hospitalisation

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (3)

Outcomes

Central Contacts