This clinical study has been developed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS); a minimally invasive coronary bypass procedure that is done on a beating heart via a smaller chest incision, thus avoiding the invasiveness of the standard procedure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
91
The MICS CABG procedure can bridge the gap between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and standard sternotomy. The key components are direct vision, creating anastomoses with traditional instruments and proximal aortic location.
Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island, New York, United States
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Technical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS Approach
For each subject, the endpoint for technical success (graft patency) in a MICS approach is defined as acceptable flow for graft size for an anastamosis. This will be characterized by the surgeon's assessment/angiography after the graft is complete.
Time frame: At time of procedure (day 1)
Procedural Success in a MICS Approach
A successful procedure can be defined as a procedures not requiring conversion (sternotomy). This will be characterized by whether the graft procedure can be completed through the minimally invasive thoracotomy without having to convert to a sternotomy in order to complete the grafting.
Time frame: At time of procedure (day 1)
Patency of the Index Graft at 6 Months
For each subject, the endpoint is the percent of stenosis collected on the subject's 6 month angiography form. This will be characterized for each graft using the FitzGibbon scoring system based on the 64-Slice CT Angiography results. The FitzGibbon Scoring system is as follows: A:Excellent graft with unimpaired runoff (\< 50% stenosis) B:Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal or distal anastomoses or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. O:Occluded (100% stenosed)
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)
During procedure and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer. The adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death
Time frame: During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Characterize the composite major adverse event rate after 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation. The major adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death
Time frame: After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation