Seal Pressure With Classical Laryngeal Mask and Cookgas Mask in Adult Patients

Universidad de Antioquia106 enrolled

Overview

The working hypothesis in this study is that the supraglottic device COOKGAS provides seal pressure as well or better than LMAc ™ when adult patients undergoing outpatient surgery, are sommeted to both interventions.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

106

Conditions

Seal Pressure

Interventions

cookgas maskDEVICE

This group will be assigned to use cookgas mask

LMA maskDEVICE

LMA mask

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Over 18 years * Patient ASA I, II and III * Complete fast * Ambulatory Surgery * Time less than two hours surgically * Supine Surgery * Acceptance of informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * No acceptance of informed consent * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Hemostatic alterations * Abdominal surgery * History of gastrointestinal reflux * BMI over 35 * Mouth opening less than 1.5 cm * Airway abnormalities * Surgery in respiratory tract

Locations (1)

Ips Universitaria

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Seal pressures

The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of the seal pressure between the mask COOKGAS ™ and LMAc in patients undergoing outpatient surgeries in ambulatory-based IPS, University of Antioquia (institution services health clinic) located in the city of Medellin.

Time frame: six months

Central Contacts

NORA M MENDOZA, MD

CONTACT

057 4 2506600 MARCEMS2@YAHOO.COM

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.