Women undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (MA HCT) will receive GnRH agonist leuprolide. Women undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic (RIC) HCT will be observed.
This study is to use gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide prior myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation to prevent ovarian dysfunction in post-menarchal women. The primary objective is to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure. The secondary objectives are * to determine how effective GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of menstrual cycles after HCT * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of normal FSH and LH levels after HCT * to determine the incidence of normal AMH levels after HCT * to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on immune reconstitution after HCT * to assess the safety and tolerability of GnRH agonists in the context of HCT A total of 47 patients will be accrued in this study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
19
Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-transplant (HCT) and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days
Conventional bone marrow transplant regimen.
A reduced-intensity conditioning transplant is a bone marrow or cord blood transplant (also called a BMT) that uses less intense treatment to prepare for transplant than a standard transplant does. While a standard transplant uses the pre-transplant treatment to destroy most of the disease cells, a reduced-intensity transplant relies on the donor's immune cells to fight disease.
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH \>40 IU/L) after transplant.
Time frame: Through Day 180 Post Transplant
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant
Time frame: From Baseline Through Day 365
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Baseline
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Day 100
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Day 180
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant
Time frame: Day 365 Post Transplant
Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Baseline
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Day 100
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Day 180
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.
Time frame: Day Prior to Transplant
Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.
Time frame: Day 180 after Transplant