Individuals living in geographically underserved areas encounter considerable barriers to access of quality cancer genetic services. Although in-person genetic counseling has generally been accepted as the standard of care, the use of telecommunications to deliver clinical genetic services may help reduce this disparity in access to such services. However, before the widespread adoption of telephone-delivered cancer genetic services occurs, it is critical to analyze the efficacy and safety of this mode of communication. This two-group randomized equivalency/non-inferiority trial will determine whether telephone-based cancer genetic counseling is an acceptable alternative to the traditional in-person mode among women who have a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer strong enough to warrant genetic counseling and testing. This study's findings will provide important information to cancer centers and cancer control policies about the safety, efficacy, and costs of delivering telephone-based clinical cancer genetic services for geographically challenged women at risk for having Breast Cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) 1/2 mutations.
Following confirmation of eligibility and completion of baseline surveys, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the study arms by the project coordinator, using a computer-generated allocation algorithm on the basis of a randomization blocks method using four, six or eight participants in each block. In-person and telephone counseling will be delivered by the same board-certified genetic counselors using a guideline-concordant semi-structured protocol that will allow for personalization of counseling. Participants randomly assigned to telephone counseling will be mailed packets that include a sealed envelope containing an educational brochure about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling with visual aids. At the time of their session, participants will review the brochure and genetic counselors will use visual aids to explain breast-ovarian cancer genetics. Women receiving in-person counseling will be given the same materials during their session at the community clinic. For women who elect to have testing, those who have telephone counseling will be sent a genetic test kit; those who have in-person counseling will have the option of giving a sample immediately at the clinic, or will be given a test kit with the same instructions as those in the telephone-counseling group. When BRCA test results become available, participants will be offered individual post-test counseling with the same genetic counselor who conducted the pretest session.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
1,012
Participants will complete a pre-test session and a test results disclosure session (if tested) with a licensed, board-certified genetic counselor over the telephone. Counseling sessions will be audiotaped for quality control of intervention.
Participants will complete a pre-test session and a test results disclosure session (if tested) with a licensed, board-certified genetic counselor in person. Counseling sessions will be audiotaped for quality control of intervention.
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Determine the non-inferiority/equivalency of telephone genetic counseling to standard in-person genetic counseling
1. Compare utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing among telephone genetic counseling relative to in-person genetic counseling. 2. Determine the safety and efficacy of telephone genetic counseling relative to in-person genetic counseling by evaluating psychological and quality of life outcomes. 3. Compare communication-related and decision-making outcomes among telephone genetic counseling relative to in-person genetic counseling.
Time frame: 6 &12-month follow-up
Determine the feasibility of the intervention
1. Examine the intervention delivery and patient costs of telephone genetic counseling relative to in-person genetic counseling. 2. Examine mediators (sociodemographic, communication factors, health care access, clinical, \& psychosocial factors) of genetic testing decisions, and affective and cognitive outcomes. 3. Compare decisions and perceptions about use of primary/secondary prevention strategies for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.
Time frame: 1 week pre-test, 1 week post-test, 6 & 12 month follow-ups
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.