RATIONALE: It is not yet know whether higher per daily radiation therapy is equally as effective as standard per daily radiation therapy in treating breast cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial studies how well an accelerated course of higher per daily radiation therapy with concomitant boost works compared to standard per daily radiation therapy with a sequential boost in treating patients with early-stage breast cancer that was removed by surgery.
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine whether an accelerated course of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) including a concomitant boost to the tumor bed in 15 fractions following lumpectomy will prove to be non-inferior in local control to a regimen of standard WBI with a sequential boost following lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer patients. Secondary * To determine whether breast-related symptoms and cosmesis from accelerated WBI that is hypofractionated (in only 3 weeks) with a concomitant boost is non-inferior to standard WBI with sequential boost. * To determine whether the risk of late cardiac toxicity in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with hypofractionation will be non-inferior to conventional fractionated radiation therapy (RT) based upon analysis of radiation dosimetry from CT-based treatment planning and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations. * To determine whether CT-based conformal methods intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for WBI are feasible in a multi-institutional setting following lumpectomy in early-stage breast cancer patients and whether dose-volume analyses can be established to assess treatment adequacy and likelihood of toxicity. * To determine that cosmetic results and breast-related symptoms 3 years after hypofractionated breast radiation with concomitant boost will not be inferior to that obtained 3 years after WBI with sequential boost. * To determine whether future correlative studies can identify individual gene expressions and biological host factors associated with toxicity and/or local recurrence from standard and hypofractionated WBI. * If shown to be non-inferior, to then determine if accelerated course of hypofractionated WBI including a concomitant boost to the tumor bed in 15 fractions following lumpectomy will prove to be superior in local control to a regimen of standard WBI with a sequential boost following lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer patients. * To determine whether treatment costs for hypofractionated WBI with concomitant boost are not higher than WBI with sequential boost. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (\< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years), prior chemotherapy (yes vs. no), estrogen-receptor status (+ vs. -), and histology grade (1-2 vs. 3). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Treatment begins within 9 weeks of last surgery or chemotherapy delivery. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 1 month, at 6 months, and then yearly.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,354
Target-based radiation using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to deliver 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy for a total dose of 50.0 Gy or 16 fractions of 2.67 Gy for a total dose of 42.7 Gy. Must begin within 9 weeks of last surgery or chemotherapy delivery.
Target-based radiation using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to deliver 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy for a total dose of 40.0 Gy. Must begin within 9 weeks of last surgery or chemotherapy delivery.
15 fractions of 3.2 Gy for a total dose of 48 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. Given concurrently with treatment to the entire breast. May be given by either electron beam or photon beams using either 3D-CRT or IMRT.
6 fractions of 2.0 Gy per fraction for a total dose of 12 Gy or 7 fractions of 2.0 Gy for a total dose of 14 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. May be given by either electron beam or photon beams using either 3D-CRT or IMRT. Begins without a treatment break after completion of the treatment to the entire breast.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
The Kirklin Clinic at Acton Road
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
21st Century Oncology-Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates-West Orange Grove
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Percentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)
In-breast recurrence (IBR) is defined as any of the following: invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (within treatment field); invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (outside treatment field); non-invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (within treatment field); or non-invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (outside treatment field). Time to IBR is defined as time from randomization to the date of first IBR, last known follow-up (censored), or death without IBR (competing risk). IBR rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Percentage of Participants Alive
Failure is defined as death due to any cause. Failure time (overall survival time) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Disease
Disease-free survival (DFS) time is defined as time from randomization to local-regional disease recurrence, distant metastases, second/new primary, death due to any cause or last known follow-up (censored). DFS rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Distant Disease
Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) time is defined as time from randomization to distant metastases, second/new primary, death due to any cause or last known follow-up (censored). DDFS rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years.
Change in Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) Cosmesis Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 Years
The BCTOS cosmesis subscale score measures perceived aesthetic (e.g., breast shape) status . Patients rated each item using a four-point scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1=no difference, 2=slight difference, 3=moderate difference, 4=large difference) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that specific subscale. Change was calculated as the value at 3 years minus the value at baseline. A positive change reflects a decline at 3 years and a negative change reflects an improvement at 3 years.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 years
Percentage of Participants With a Physician-reported Cosmetic Score of Excellent or Good at 3 Years
Physicians rated cosmesis using a four point scale: * Excellent: When compared to the untreated breast or the original appearance of the breast, there is minimal/no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast. * Good: There is a slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the opposite breast or the original appearance of the treated breast. * Fair: Obvious differences in the size and shape of the treated breast. This change involves quarter or less of the breast. * Poor: Marked change in the appearance of the treated breast involving more than a quarter of the breast tissue.
Time frame: 3 years
Correlation Between Dose-volume Data and Both Adverse Events and Efficacy
Time frame: From randomization to end of follow-up.
Translational Research of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGFB1) and Ataxia-Telangiesctasia Mutated (ATM) Genes
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up.
Treatment Cost
Time frame: From randomization to end of treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Banner University Medical Center - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States
CHI Saint Vincent Cancer Center Hot Springs
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Auburn
Auburn, California, United States
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Cameron Park
Cameron Park, California, United States
...and 405 more locations