Prevention of Damage Induced by Facial Mask Ventilation

Overview

In patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) undergoing noninvasive ventilation (NIV), the main complication of the use of the mask is the development of decubitus, sometimes so severe and painful as to force a suspension of the NIV itself . The lesions are mainly located at the nasal bridge, as at this level the skin thin and placed directly on the bone is particularly vulnerable to the injury as consequence of the friction and pressure induced by the movement of the mask. The strategy of prevention and treatment commonly adopted is the application of hydrocolloids. However, precise data are lacking about the demonstration of the effectiveness of these devices and the possibility of using other protective devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of large-scale three different systems of protection vs. no protection in preventing the development of decubitus lesions in patients receiving NIV for an episode of ARF.

NIV is a form of ventilatory support which is popular overall in the world. The patient interface most commonly used in the course of NIV is by far the nasal or oronasal mask. The main complication of the use of the mask is the development of decubitus, sometimes so severe and painful as to force a suspension of NIV. The decubitus is mainly located at the nasal bridge, as at this level the skin thin and placed directly on the bone. According to Meduri et al.(Chest 1996) the duration of NIV, age, type of respiratory failure, the pressure used for ventilation and the level of albumin did not influence the development of necrosis. Severe skin injury with ulceration and necrosis occurs in approximately 10% of patients receiving NIV trained in services. In the multicenter evaluation of a new face mask dedicated to the NIV (Gregoretti et al, Intens Care Med 2002) describes the development of NIV-induced decubitus in 100% of the control group treated with masks "traditional", with an average grade of 2.79 on a scale of Assessment Standard ranging from 1 (erythema) to 4 (necrosis). The strategy of prevention and treatment commonly adopted is the application of appropriately shaped hydrocolloids. However, the data relating to the use of protective systems for the prevention of NIV-induced decubitus are limited and controversial. In a first pilot study (Callaghan et al,Professional Nurse 1998, the authors compared the protective efficacy of two types of "dressing" (Granuflex, Spenco Dermal and 10 patients, 10 patients) vs a non-randomized control group (10 patients): 30 patients in total . In this work, which presents a problem of inter-observer variability, the "Granuflex group" (or Duoderm) showed a greater protective effect (3 vs. 7 lesions in "Spenco Dermal group" vs 9 lesions in the control group). Recently, in a larger study, Weng (Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2008) compared the efficacy of two devices (Tegaderm and tegasorb) vs. a control group in 90 patients (30 per group) undergoing NIV. The rate of lesions was significantly lower in the treated groups (53% Tegaderm; Tegasorb 40%) than in the control group (96.7%), with no significant difference between the two interventional arms on both the incidence and the timing of onset of injury. Therefore, given the limited data currently available regarding both the effectiveness and the choice of a protective device and in consideration of the continuous expansion of NIV in the acute setting, in our opinion it's seems to us justified to perform a controlled study comparing different types of devices in terms of skin protection during NIV.