12 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and refractory gait disturbances under best individual subthalamic nucleus stimulation and dopaminergic medication will be included into this randomised double-blind cross-over two-armed clinical trial. The treatment consists of two different stimulation settings using (i) conventional stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus \[STNmono\] and (ii) combined stimulation of distant electrode contacts located in the subthalamic nucleus and caudal border zone of STN and substantia nigra pars reticulata \[STN+SNr\].
A composite 'axial score' including the major clinical and anamnestic items on gait, posture and balance function from UPDRSII (items 13-15) and UPDRS III (items 27-31) constitutes the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include specified clinical and anamnestic assessments on freezing of gait, balance, quality of life, non-motor symptoms, impulsivity, impulse control and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The aim of the present trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined stimulation on subthalamic and nigral electrode contacts \[STN+SNr\] in refractory hypokinetic gait disturbances compared with \[STNmono\] (active comparator). The results will clarify, whether the combined \[STN+SNr\] stimulation improves otherwise refractory gait disturbances in PD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
12
High frequent deep brain stimulation with variable (best individual) stimulation on subthalamic contacts and standard parameters on nigral contacts (125 Hz, 60µs, best individual amplitude)
Center of Neurology and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, and Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
'Axial score'
The composite 'axial score' is built by 8 items from the UPDRS II and III, all 5-point rated (0 to 4) representing increasing levels of pathology. The 'axial score' will be scored by the sum of the ratings across the 8 items (Range 0 to 32). As change in UPDRS scores is a common primary efficacy outcome measure in Parkinson's disease and only items of the original UPDRS are required for the definition of the primary endpoint, the statistical evaluation methods should be based on the psychometric validation of the UPDRS and no own validation studies are necessary. Safety: falls
Time frame: Three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
CAPSIT-PD
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Freezing of gait assessment course
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Freezing of gait questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Non-motor symptoms scale
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Non-motor symptoms quest
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Beck's depression scale index
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
UPDRS I-IV
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively
PDQ-39
Time frame: At baseline and three weeks after active treatment (STN vs. STN+SNr), respectively