What's the purpose of this study? This 4-year study is designed: (1) to teach primary care physicians how to recognize low health literacy patients and effectively counsel them on cancer screening using risk communication and shared decision making and (2) to assess the impact of training on changes in physician communication behavior and changes in low health literacy patients' cancer screening behaviors. This study proposal is based on the hypothesis that physician training in cancer screening guidelines, health literacy, and communication skills will improve provider-patient interactions during encounters dealing with preventive health maintenance especially cancer screening. How will the proposed study be implemented? Thirty-two physicians in the New Orleans metropolitan area will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The unit of randomization will be the health care organization or clinic. The intervention group will receive training in health literacy, cancer screening, risk communication and shared decision-making. The control group will not receive communication training until the end of the study. Physicians in both groups will undergo three clinic visits with standardized patients (actors trained to portray real patients; mystery shoppers) but they will not be aware that they are conducting visits with actors. The visits will occur at study enrollment and at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each clinic visit, the standardized patients will rate the physicians' communication skills. Each physician assigned to the intervention group will receive verbal feedback on communication skills from the standardized patients and complete a web-based tutorial. Physicians in the control group will not have access to the web-based tutorial until the end of the study. For each physician, 10-15 patients with limited health literacy will be recruited to the study. Each patient will rate his/her perceived involvement with care and global satisfaction with care at study enrollment and annually for three years. Age and gender-appropriate referral rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening and patients' receipt of such screening will be assessed annually for three years. All study physicians, regardless of group assignment, will receive performance feedback (report cards) on their cancer screening rates among low health literacy patients in their clinic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
168
Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM). At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback. After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert. Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading. Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.
Tulane Communty Health Center at Covenant House
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Tulane Faculty Practice
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
EXCELth - Ida Hymel Community Health Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
DCSNO St Cecelia Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
DCSNO Carrollton Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Change in cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening rates
Cervical/Breast/Colorectal cancer screening rates will be measured at baseline and annually for 2 years to assess whether screening rates improve over time
Time frame: 0, 12, 24 months
Change in standardized patient ratings of physician communication behaviors
The mystery shoppers (standardized patients) will rate the physicians' shared decision making and counseling about cancer screening prior to the intervention at baseline and then again at 6-month and 12-month follow up evaluations to assess whether communication behaviors improve over time
Time frame: 0, 6, 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.