The primary objective was to assess the superiority of darbepoetin alfa versus placebo on the incidence of red blood cell transfusions during the 24-week double-blind treatment period in anemic patients with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS.
This study consists of a 3-week screening period, a 24-week double-blind treatment period, and a 48-week active treatment period and the long-term follow-up period. An end of treatment period (EOTP) visit occurs at week 25, or 3 weeks after last dose of investigational product (IP) for participants who withdraw from the study. After entering the active treatment period, an end of active treatment period (EOATP) visit occurs at week 72 / 73, or 3 weeks after the last dose of darbepoetin alfa. Long-term follow-up (LTFU) will occur every 26 weeks (± 4 weeks) from the EOATP visit (or EOTP visit if the participant does not enter the active treatment period) and will continue for a minimum of 3 years from the first dose of IP. Follow-up may occur through clinic visit or telephone contacts. Information on the participant's survival and progression to AML status will be collected during LTFU.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
147
Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Erythroid Response Based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Criteria in the Double-blind Treatment Period
International Working Group 2006 erythroid response was defined as achieving an initial ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin from baseline and sustaining an average rise of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in a rolling 56-consecutive day period in the absence of RBC transfusion. Participants with no hemoglobin collected to the minimum time required to observe an IWG erythroid response (Week 13) were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
The severity of each adverse event was graded using the the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading scale, where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening and grade 5 = death. Prespecified adverse events of interest for darbepoetin alfa, based on clinical data in anemic patients with cancer, included the following categories: hypersensitivity, cardiac failure, hypertension, malignancies, embolic and thrombolic events, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), central nervous system vascular disorders, and ischemic heart disease.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of the double-blind treatment period; 24 weeks.
Number of Participants With Disease Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Transformation to AML was assessed according to WHO guidelines in the absence of IP and any haematopoietic growth factors (2 weeks off dosing). Bone marrow and/or cytogenetic report confirmation of AML was required (marrow or peripheral blast cells ≥ 20%, presence of pathognomic AML cytogenetic change, or evidence of marrow blast criteria for erythroleukemia). A pathology report confirming other leukemias such as chloroma (granulocytic sarcoma, myeloid sarcoma) or leukemia cutis also constituted transformation to AML.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Innsbruck, Austria
Research Site
Linz, Austria
Research Site
Salzburg, Austria
Research Site
Vienna, Austria
Research Site
Bruges, Belgium
Research Site
Brussels, Belgium
Research Site
Charleroi, Belgium
Research Site
Ghent, Belgium
Research Site
Haine Saint Paul - La Louviere, Belgium
Research Site
Hasselt, Belgium
...and 62 more locations
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Malignancies Other Than AML, Basal Cell Carcinoma, or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-darbepoetin alfa antibodies. Samples were first tested in an immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to darbepoetin alfa. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against darbepoetin alfa. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. The number of participants who developed antibodies to darbepoetin alfa is defined as participants who were neutralizing antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and end of double-blind treatment period (24 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values.
Time frame: Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a global evaluation of overall health state with scores ranging from 0 (worse health state a participant can imagine) to 100 (best health state a participant can imagine). End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values.
Time frame: Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Fatigue
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. Clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue is defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points in the FACIT-Fatigue subscale score, from baseline to EOTP.
Time frame: Baseline to week 24