Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients

Daren K. Heyland503 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of the study is to inform decision-makers of the best strategies to implement advanced care planning (ACP). An advanced care plan (ACP) is a verbal or written instruction describing what kind of care an individual would want (or not want)if they are no longer able speak for themselves to make health care decisions.

Advance Care Planning (ACP) may offer some assistance with reducing health care costs for older Canadians and yet, at the same time, improving quality of care. ACP is the process by which a person considers options about future health care decisions and identifies their wishes. ACP has been shown to increase the quality of life of dying patients, improve the experience of family members, and decrease health care costs. There have been initiatives leading to the development and implementation of system-wide strategies to increase ACP, however there has been no evaluation of the effectiveness of these efforts from the perspective of patients and families. Many questions pertaining to barriers and facilitators to implementation and impact of ACP on outcomes in Canada remain. The investigators propose to conduct a perspective audit of current practice related to ACP in elderly patients at high-risk for dying and their families. The investigators will determine the extent to which these patients and families have engaged in ACP, what barriers and facilitators they preceive, and how satisfied they are with communication and decision making at the end of life. Informed by a baseline evaluation of site strengths, weaknesses and barriers, the investigators propose to develop tailored interventions to enable participating sites to improve their success with ACP during the entire study period. By repeating the audit and feedback cycle annually, the investigators will enable sites to make continuous efforts to improve their performance and be able to evaluate the effect of our audit/feedback/tailored intervention strategy compared to baseline. Additionally, for those patients who have engaged in ACP activities, the investigators can compare their outcomes to those who have not. The overall goal of this study is to inform decision-makers as the best strategies to implement advance care planning (ACP).

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

503

Conditions

Critical Illness Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Congestive Heart Failure Cirrhosis Cancer

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 55 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * 55 years or older with one or more of the following diagnoses: * Chronic obstructive lung disease - 2 of the 4 of: baseline PaCO2 of \> 45 torr, cor pulmonale; respiratory failure episode within the preceding year; forced expiratory volume in 1 sec \<0.5 L. * Congestive heart failure - New York Heart Association class IV symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25%. * Cirrhosis - confirmed by imaging studies or documentation of esophageal varices and one of three conditions: a) hepatic coma, b) Child's class C liver disease, or c) Child's class B liver disease with gastrointestinal bleeding. * Cancer - metastatic cancer or stage IV lymphoma. * End-stage dementia (inability to perform all ADLs, mutism or minimal verbal output secondary to dementia, bed-bound state prior to acute illness) OR * Any patient 80 years of age or older admitted to hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition. Exclusion Criteria: * Non-English speaking patient/family member * Patient with cognitive impairment

Locations (9)

Peter Lougheed Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Royal Columbian Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Extent of Implementation of ACP

a. Does the patient have an advance directive or living will or some other written document expressing their wishes? b.patient and/or family been informed of the patients' prognosis? c.Has the patient and/or family been informed about the expected benefits and burdens of various treatment options? d.Has the patient considered how s/he wants to live in the final stages of life and what kinds of medical treatments they would want or not want? e.Have they discussed this with their family? A health care provider? g.Has there been a discussion about their goals of care with their health care provider? If so, are they aware of them? h.Has there been a decision made about medical treatments at the end of life? If so, what role did the patient/family play in that decision-making and was this consistent with their preferred role? i.Is there documentation in the medical record of the overall goals of care?

Time frame: Year 3

Secondary Outcomes

Effect of an audit and feedback process plus tailored interventions ACP

Compared to baseline, what is the effect of an audit and feedback process coupled with tailored interventions on use of and satisfaction with ACP at the site level?

Time frame: Year 3

Impact of ACP on patient/family satisfaction

Compared to those patients who have not undergone an ACP process upon enrolment, what is the impact of ACP on patient/family satisfaction with care, use of life-sustaining technologies, and hospital resources during index hospital admission and long-term health care utilization?

Time frame: Year 3

ACP components associated with overall satisfaction

Which components of ACP are more strongly associated with overall satisfaction with EOL communication and decision making?

Time frame: Year 3

Comparison of sites with low vs high system level implementation of ACP on satisfaction

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.