Based on information from several years of looking at Influenza vaccination doctors know that: * Older adults suffer the worst illness and most deaths caused by Influenza illness of all age groups. * Older adults do not seem to get as good a level of protection as younger adults after getting the usual seasonal Influenza vaccine. Because of this information doctors wonder if one of the new seasonal Influenza vaccines is more effective or more acceptable. This study has been designed to answer some of these questions. On this study doctors will compare 2 new vaccines against the usual seasonal influenza vaccine for protectiveness using several different testing methods (including the usual tests) and for acceptability.
This study is prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled, parallel group study of 3 licensed seasonal influenza vaccine products conducted in seniors, with a 4th vaccine included in a substudy of cellular immune responses. Ambulatory adults 65+ years of age, in good health or with stable health conditions, given TIV within the past 2 years, will be recruited in multiple Canadian centres. Subjects can be dwelling in the community or in centers providing minimal assisted living support. A total of 930 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will be centrally (electronically) randomized to receive either TIV, IDV or AIV on Day 0. Three blood samples will be collected (1 pre and 2 post vaccination) to measure HAI antibody responses to each virus strain (H1N1, H3N2 and B) in each vaccine, using standardized assays. Randomly selected subsets of sera from each study group will also be tested for neutralizing antibody and for cross-protection against drift variants of H3N2, H1N1 and B viruses. In a subset of subjects in Vancouver, randomization assignments will include TIV2 and extra blood samples will be obtained 0, 21 and 72 days post vaccination for CMI testing. Safety assessments will be conducted on Day 7, Day 21 and Day 180 following vaccination. Acceptability of each product, reflecting the frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse effects, will be assessed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
953
University of British Columbia, VITALiTY Research Center
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
University of Manitoba, Department of Medicine
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Canadian Centre for Vaccinology Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
University of Toronto, Mt Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
McGill University Health Center - Vaccine Study Center
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unité de Recherche en Santé Publique (CHUQ),
Québec, Quebec, Canada
HAI response
The primary outcome measures will be the 3-week post-vaccination immune (HAI) responses to the 3 vaccine strains present in each product, assessed by the EMEA/CHMP criteria for evaluation of immune responses to influenza vaccines in persons \>60 years of age.
Time frame: Day 0; Day 21; Day 180
Seroprotection rates using microneutralization titres and cytokine testing
As secondary immunologic outcomes seroprotection rates will be compared between the products using a higher titer (≥160) as threshold. Microneutralization titers will be compared among products at the 3 sampling points, using sera from 100 subjects per group. Cross-protection afforded by each vaccine against drift variants of H3N2, H1N1 and B viruses will be assessed using serum panels selected from 50 subjects in each group. Cellular immune responses elicited will be compared in subgroups of 30 subjects per vaccine in the CMI subjset.
Time frame: Day 0; Day 21; and Day 70
Safety and Acceptability
Safety and acceptability of the vaccines will also be examined and compared as the safety outcomes. The primary outcome measurements will be the rates of local adverse events (pain, redness, swelling, itchiness) as rates of general adverse events are not expected to differ substantially among the products.
Time frame: Days 0-6; Day 21; Day 70; and Day 180
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.