The purpose of this explorative study, targeting subjects with advanced binocular glaucomatous visual field loss, is: (i) to identify the perimetric / psychophysical method, that is most closely correlated with an individually assessed quality of life (QoL) score, using a validated questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25), (ii) to determine, whether gaze-related (exploratory eye movements) or visual field-related (eyes steadily fixating) OR attention-related parameters are better for the characterization of the visual capacities that are necessary for activities of daily living (ADL), as represented (iia) by a standardized visual search task and (iib) by an on-road car driving feasibility study. Further this study is intended to introduce and analyse a novel diagnostic method for recording and evaluating exploratory eye movements (gaze-related perimetry) in a clinical setting. A similar procedure has recently been introduced by Murray et al. However, their set-up is based on a video monitor and, therefore, restricted to the central visual field (eccentricity \< 25°) and limited with regard to the dynamic range of the stimulus luminance. Since our new gaze-related perimetry is designed to be implemented in a conventional cupola perimeter, it should be widely available as a potent diagnostic tool, for screening purposes, or for clinical surveys by general ophthalmologists or clinical research groups.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
Centre for Ophthalmology University of Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Identification of the perimetric / psychophysical method, that is most closely correlated with an individually assessed quality of life (QoL) score.
Quality of life (QoL), assessed with the NEI-VFQ 25 questionnaire, is better correlated with the modified ESTERMAN score, based on the binocular semi-automated kinetic perimetry of the 90° visual field (90° SKP) than with the number of affected test locations (local sensitivity \< 10 dB) according to the binocular integrated visual field (IVF).
Time frame: 2 years
Determination of the most appropriate parameters (gaze-related ; visual field-related; attention-related) for the characterization of the visual capacities for activities of daily living
Performance regarding activities of daily living (ADL), as represented by the "supermarket special offer search task", are better correlated with (the modified ESTERMAN score, based on) the intact binocular gaze field than with (the modified ESTERMAN score, based on) the binocular semi-automated kinetic perimetry of the 90° visual field (90° SKP) OR the with the number of affected test locations (local sensitivity \< 10 dB) of the binocular integrated visual field (IVF) OR the UFOV risk score.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of the comprehensive psychophysical examinations
The scotoma extent, assessed with MAFOV, is equal to the scotoma extent assessed with the fast thresholding conventional static automated perimetry (SAP) (GATE strategy, Grid 30-S). Additionally, test/re-test reliability will be assessed with regard to (i) MAFOV and (ii) SAP (as described above), assuming that test/retest reliability is identical between MAFOV and SAP.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison and evaluation of two different assessments of visual exploration under real-life scenarios ("supermarket special offer search task", "on-road car driving" by means of a dual brake vehicle (optional: driving simulator)
Performance regarding acitivities of daily living (ADL), as assessed by the "supermarket special offer search task" and the "on-road car driving pilot study", are better correlated with (the ESTERMAN score, based on) the intact binocular gaze field than with (the ESTERMAN score, based on) the binocular semi-automated kinetic perimetry of the 90° visual field (90° SKP) OR the with the number of affected test locations (local sensitivity \< 10 dB) of the binocular integrated visual field (IVF) OR the UFOV risk score.
Time frame: 2 years
Descriptive assessment of structure-function relationships by comparing the results of the different perimetric tests with the morphometric results of HRT III
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.