This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of GSK2251052 in subjects with complicated intra abdominal infections. GSK2251052 will be compared to meropenem, an IV therapy that is approved for use in the treatment of subjects with cIAI. GSK2251052 has a spectrum of microbiological activity that includes pathogens responsible for cIAI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
15
Reconstituted, added to 250mL 0.9% NaCl solution and administered via IV infusion
Reconstituted, added to 100mL 0.9% NaCl solution and administered via IV infusion
saline placebo
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE included AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition
Time frame: Up to Day 42
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Trends in Vital Signs Over the Period of Study Duration
Vital parameters including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and temperature were recorded. The number of participants with potentially clinically concern value of any vital parameter at any visit were reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 42
Number of Participants With Normal and Abnormal ECG Findings
12-lead ECGs was obtained during the study using an ECG machine and performed with the participant in a semi-supine position rested in this position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Measurements deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Number of participants with normal and abnormal ECG findings were reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 42
Laboratory Parameters of Interest- Mean Hemoglobin Over the Period of Study Duration
Absolute mean hemoglobin values recorded over the period of duration were reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 42
Laboratory Parameters of Interest- Mean Reticulocytes Over the Period of Study Duration
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Topeka, Kansas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, United States
...and 21 more locations
Absolute mean reticulocytes values recorded over the period of duration were reported.
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin for Partcipants With Significant Hemoglobin Drop
Participants in whom the hemoglobin level dropped by more than 30% from Baseline that was not attributable to acute blood loss were recorded and immediately withdrawn from study treatment. Baseline assessments were recorded on Visit 1 (Day 1) and used as Baseline values. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from Day 42 values. If either the Baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing. The mean change from Baseline in hemoglobin for participants with significant hemoglobin drop were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Day 42
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit (5-9 Days Post-therapy) in Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) Population
Test of cure-clinical success was resolution of signs and symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) for participants who were clinical successes at the end of IV therapy visit with no new symptoms recorded that were not present at Baseline and no use of additional antibiotic therapy for cIAI. Test of cure-clinical failure was persistence of signs and symptoms of cIAI recorded at Baseline, or reappearance of signs and symptoms that had previously resolved, or new signs and symptoms recorded that were not present at a previous visit, or receipt of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy for cIAI or participant had died. Test of cure- unable to determine was refusal to consent to a clinical examination, lost to follow-up. Participants who were 'unable to determine' at End of IV therapy were considered 'unable to determine' Test of cure Visit as well. Due to early termination of the study, a Bayesian approach for informal hypothesis testing was not performed.
Time frame: Day 5 to 9 post IV therapy
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit (5-9 Days Post-therapy) in Microbiological Evaluable Population.
Test of cure-clinical success was resolution of signs and symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) for participants who were clinical successes at the end of IV therapy visit with no new symptoms recorded that were not present at Baseline and no use of additional antibiotic therapy for cIAI. Test of cure-clinical failure was persistence of signs and symptoms of cIAI recorded at Baseline, or reappearance of signs and symptoms that had previously resolved, or new signs and symptoms recorded that were not present at a previous visit, or receipt of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy for cIAI or participant had died. Test of cure- unable to determine was refusal to consent to a clinical examination, lost to follow-up. Participants who were 'unable to determine' at End of IV therapy were considered 'unable to determine' Test of cure Visit as well. Due to early termination of the study, a Bayesian approach for informal hypothesis testing was not performed.
Time frame: Day 5 to 9 post IV therapy
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response in MITT Population
Microbiological Response at End of IV Therapy was assessed as Microbiological Success (MS) or Microbiological Failure (MF). MS was categorized as microbiological eradication (ME) and presumed microbiological eradication (PME). MF was categorized as microbiological persistence (MP), presumed microbiological persistence (PMP), unable to determine, new infection and colonization. Number of participants with microbiological response in MITT population were reported.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy); Test of cure (5-9 days post-therapy); Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response in Microbiological Evaluable Population
Microbiological Response at End of IV Therapy was assessed as MS or MF. MS was categorized as ME and PME. MF was categorized as MP and PMP, unable to determine, new infection and colonization. Number of participants with microbiological response in microbiological evaluable population were reported.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy); Test of cure (5-9 days post-therapy); Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response in Microbiological Evaluable Population
Clinical success was defined as resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cIAI, including white blood cell count within normal limits, participant was afebrile and peritoneal findings consistent with cIAI were no longer present with no new symptoms present that were not present at Baseline and no use of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy. Clinical failure was defined as (1) Lack of improvement or worsening in one or more signs and symptoms of cIAI recorded at Baseline, or reappearance of signs and symptoms that had previously resolved, or (2) signs and symptoms recorded that were not present at Baseline, or (3) receipt of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy for cIAI or (4) participant had died, or (5) participant had an adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation and the participant required additional or alternative antibacterial therapy for the current cIAI.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy); Test of cure (5-9 days post-therapy); Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response in MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cIAI, including white blood cell count within normal limits, participant was afebrile and peritoneal findings consistent with cIAI were no longer present with no new symptoms present that were not present at Baseline and no use of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy. Clinical failure was defined as (1) Lack of improvement or worsening in one or more signs and symptoms of cIAI recorded at Baseline, or reappearance of signs and symptoms that had previously resolved, or (2) signs and symptoms recorded that were not present at Baseline, or (3) receipt of additional or alternate antibiotic therapy for cIAI or (4) participant had died, or (5) participant had an adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation and the participant required additional or alternative antibacterial therapy for the current cIAI.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy) and Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Response in Microbiological Evaluable Population
Therapeutic response was a measure of the overall efficacy response, and a therapeutic success referred to participants who had been deemed both a 'clinical success' and a 'microbiological success'. All other combinations (other than 'clinical success' + 'microbiological success') were deemed failures for therapeutic response. Therapeutic response was determined programmatically.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy); Test of cure (5-9 days post-therapy); Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Response in MITT Population
Therapeutic response was a measure of the overall efficacy response, and a therapeutic success referred to participants who had been deemed both a 'clinical success' and a 'microbiological success'. All other combinations (other than 'clinical success' + 'microbiological success') were deemed failures for therapeutic response. Therapeutic response was determined programmatically.
Time frame: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy); Test of cure (5-9 days post-therapy); Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK2251052
Cmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 3: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of GSK2251052
AUC was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 3: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
Time to Cmax (Tmax) of GSK2251052
Tmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 3: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
Cmax of GSK2251052 Using Non-intensive PK Sampling
Cmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
AUC of GSK2251052 Using Non-intensive PK Sampling
AUC was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
Tmax of GSK2251052 Using Non-intensive PK Sampling
Tmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre- dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) and 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
Cmax of GSK2251052 Using Intensive PK Sampling
Cmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) 0.5, 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose
AUC of GSK2251052 Using Intensive PK Sampling
AUC was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) 0.5, 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose
Tmax of GSK2251052 Using Intensive PK Sampling
Tmax was planned to be determined. A nonlinear mixed effects model as implemented in the program NONMEM was planned to be used to analyze plasma concentration data. However, data for PK analysis was not collected.
Time frame: Day 5: Pre-dose (just prior to the start of the first infusion of the day) 0.5, 1 hour (just prior to the end of the infusion), 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose