One hundred seventy-five eligible participants will be enrolled with aim of randomizing 60 to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of D-cycloserine added to cue-exposure treatment to prevent relapse to smoking. Subjects who sign an informed consent, meet inclusion criteria, and demonstrate response to cue reactivity at the screening visit, will either be: * started on approximately 3 weeks of either nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) at a dose of either 14 or 21 mg/day or varenicline titrated to 1.0 mg bid; decision of which method to use to quit smoking will be based on participant choice as well as taking into account any medical contraindications to either therapy. * evaluated to confirm abstinence from smoking. Recently abstinent participants referred by a smoking cessation clinic, PCP or self referred must have an expired air CO \< 10 ppm to confirm abstinence. Subjects who are able to demonstrate 18-24 hours of abstinence prior to the first Cue Exposure Therapy Visit (CET I) will be eligible to be randomized to two visits of study medication and cue exposure treatment, spaced five to nine days apart. Subjects will complete 2 follow-up visits at 2-4 days and four weeks after the last CET visit. The entire study involves twelve visits and will last approximately ten weeks. For recently abstinent participants referred by a smoking cessation clinic, PCP or self referred, the study involves 7 visits (screening and baseline visit will be merged into one and there is no CBT component) and will last approximately 7 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
150
2 single weekly doses, 50 mg capsule
Massachusetts General Hospital - Center For Addiction Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Continuous Abstinence From Tobacco Smoking.
Participants assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will achieve better maintenance of tobacco abstinence, as assessed with self-report and saliva cotinine measurements, than those who receive placebo + CET at week 6 follow up visits
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Skin Conductance
Recently abstinent smokers assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will have less physiologic (skin conductance) reactivity to smoking cues at the Post-Extinction Assessment than those who receive placebo + CET. Subjects were presented with 2 blocks of audio recordings, one smoking-related script and one neutral script unrelated to smoking. Assessment of skin conductance was made after each audio recording was presented. The skin conductance mean was obtained for each script (smoking vs neutral). Differences in responsivity (skin conductance) to smoking cues (smoking script) was compared between subjects who received D-cycloserine + CET and subjects who received placebo + CET.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Heart Rate
Recently abstinent smokers assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will have less physiologic (heart rate) reactivity to smoking cues at the Post-Extinction Assessment than those who receive placebo + CET. Subjects were presented with 2 blocks of audio recordings, one smoking-related script and one neutral script unrelated to smoking. Heart rate measurement was obtained after each audio recording was presented. The heart rate mean was obtained for each script (smoking vs neutral). Differences in responsivity (heart rate) to smoking cues (smoking script) was compared between subjects who received D-cycloserine + CET and subjects who received placebo + CET.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Electromyogram
Recently abstinent smokers assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will have less physiologic (electromyogram) reactivity to smoking cues at the Post-Extinction Assessment than those who receive placebo + CET. Subjects were presented with 2 blocks of audio recordings, one smoking-related script and one neutral script unrelated to smoking. Electromyogram of the corrugator (EMGc)measurement was obtained after each audio recording was presented. The EMGc mean was obtained for each script (smoking vs neutral). Differences in responsivity (EMGc) to smoking cues (smoking script) was compared between subjects who received D-cycloserine + CET and subjects who received placebo + CET.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Craving
Recently abstinent smokers assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will have less craving at the Post-Extinction Assessment than those who receive placebo + CET The scale used to measure craving was a Visual Analogue Scale 0 (no desire at all) - 7 (unable to resist) Subjects were presented with 2 blocks of audio recordings, one smoking-related script and one neutral script unrelated to smoking. Craving level was obtained after each audio recording was presented. The craving mean was obtained for each script (smoking vs neutral). Differences in craving level response to smoking cues (smoking script) was compared between subjects who received D-cycloserine + CET and subjects who received placebo + CET.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Effect of D-cycloserine + Cue-exposure Treatment on Attentional Bias Toward Smoking Cuesmeasured With the Emotional Stroop Task
Recently abstinent smokers assigned to receive D-cycloserine + CET will have less attentional bias (Smoking Stroop task) toward smoking cues at the Post-Extinction Assessment than those who receive placebo + CET The Emotional Stroop uses smoking-related words and neutral words to measure attentional bias toward smoking related cues. Attentional bias is a central feature of many cognitive theories of addiction and can be measured with an emotional analog of the Stroop task. In this task, participants name the colors in which words are printed, and the words vary in their relevance to smoking. Extensive research has shown that patients are often slower to name the color of a word associated with concerns relevant to their clinical condition due to distraction by the meaning of the word(Williams, Mathews et al. 1996). The Stroop interference Score is obtained by subtracting Reaction Time (RT) to smoking minus the Reaction Time to neutral
Time frame: Baseline and week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.