The purpose of this study is to compare the sweetness of 2 new atazanavir powder for oral use (POU) formulations to the current atazanavir POU in healthy participants and to select 1 atazanavir POU that has the sweetness most similar to the current atazanavir POU.
This study is a taste assessment study designed to select a new atazanavir powder for oral use (POU) formulation that is similar in sweetness to the current POU formulation. Participants were to taste and then spit out the POU formulations, without swallowing them. Study Classification: Other. This is a taste study
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
12
Solution, oral, atazanavir 15 mg/5 mL with 10% aspartame, single dose
Solution, oral, atazanavir 15 mg/5 mL with 4.2% aspartame, single dose
Solution, oral, atazanavir 15 mg/5 mL with 4.2% aspartame and sucralose, single dose
Pra International
Lenexa, Kansas, United States
Median Scores on a Subjective Sweet Intensity Scale for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
Tasting atazanavir (15 mg, administered as a 5 mL oral suspension) was defined as taking the sample into the mouth, swishing it across the tongue for approximately 30 seconds without swallowing, and then spitting it out. Immediately after tasting each treatment, participants scored the treatments for sweetness using a subjective sweet intensity scoring system: 0=not sweet, 1=mildly sweet, 2=moderately sweet, 3=very sweet. Participants were permitted to select a whole or half score number (for example, 1.5) between the minimum score of 0 and the maximum score of 3.0. The higher the score, the greater the sweetness.
Time frame: Study Day 1
Mean Scores on a Subjective Sweet Intensity Scale for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
Tasting atazanavir (15 mg, administered as a 5 mL oral suspension) was defined as taking the sample into the mouth, swishing it across the tongue for approximately 30 seconds without swallowing, and then spitting it out. Immediately after tasting each treatment, participants scored the treatments for sweetness using a subjective sweet intensity scoring system: 0=not sweet, 1=mildly sweet, 2=moderately sweet, 3=very sweet. Participants were permitted to select a whole or half score number (for example, 1.5) between the minimum score of 0 and the maximum score of 3.0. The higher the score, the greater the sweetness.
Time frame: Study Day 1
Median Palatability Score for Current and New Powder for Oral Use Formulations of Atazanavir
Overall palatability was scored on a scale of 1 through 5, with 1 being least palatable and 5 being most palatable. Only whole score numbers were accepted.
Time frame: Study Day 1
Mean Palatability Score for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
Overall palatability was scored on a scale of 1 through 5, with 1 being least palatable and 5 being most palatable. Only whole score numbers were accepted.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Study Day 1
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests
Time frame: Study Day 1
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings on Electrocardiograms
Time frame: Study Day 1
Number of Participants Who Died and With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Study Day 1
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs
Time frame: Study Day 1