The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of FLOSEAL to standard of care for hemostasis in subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
137
Conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression, will be used.
FLOSEAL will be applied topically to areas of the knee where bleeding is observed (e.g. cut bone surfaces, subcutaneous tissue, posterior joint capsule, synovial tissue, medial and lateral gutters, branches of the genicular vessels, and suprapatellar pouch) and will occur intraoperatively. Sufficient amounts of FLOSEAL will be applied quickly using the provided applicators, followed by immediate approximation with a damp gauze, lap pad or sponge for approximately 2 minutes. \+ Standard of care: conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression, will be used
Cedars-Sinai Orthopedic Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Orthopedics
Redwood City, California, United States
Colorado Orthopedic Consultants, PC
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Day 2 Post-operatively
Time frame: Pre-operative and 2 days post-operatively
Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)
* Proportion of Participants who have serious injuries (SIs) related to IP * Proportion of Participants who have non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) related to IP
Time frame: Throughout the study period, 1 year and 4 months
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 1 Post-operatively
Time frame: Pre-operative and day 1 post-operatively
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 3 Post-operatively
Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hgb levels.
Time frame: Pre-operative and day 3 post-operatively
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 1
Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.
Time frame: Pre-operative and day 1 post-operatively
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 2
Time frame: Pre-operative and day 2 post-operatively
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 3
Time frame: Pre-operative and day 3 post-operatively
Total Tourniquet Time
Measured from the time point of the tourniquet inflation to deflation using the same watch/clock
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Florida Research Associates, LLC
DeLand, Florida, United States
Shrock Orthopedic Research, LLC
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Phoenix Clinical Research, LLC
Tamarac, Florida, United States
Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana Foundations
Mooresville, Indiana, United States
Rothman Institute
Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States
The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 2 more locations
Time frame: Intra-operatively (on day of surgery = Day 0)
Amount of FLOSEAL Applied
Time frame: Intra-operatively (Day 0)
Duration of Surgery
Time frame: Time from first incision to complete wound closure (Day 0)
Transfusion Requirements - Packed Red Blood Cells
Time frame: Intra-operatively (Day 0) thru Postoperative Day 3
Total Drain Output at Day 1 Post-operatively
Time frame: 1 day post-operatively
Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was Used
Each participant kept a knee pain management diary. The diary was used to document the pain medication taken on a daily basis. While the participants were hospitalized, either they filled out the diary, or study team members collected the pain diary data and filled out the diary.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0); and post-operatively daily thru week 6
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3, Week 1, 2 and 6
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Day 3
Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 1
Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 1
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 2
Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 2
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 6
Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 6
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index Scores
A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues) Postoperative (Postop)
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6
Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Scores
A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues). Postoperative (Postop)
Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6
Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6
Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available.
Time frame: Preoperative, and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6
Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available. Change in SF-36 Scores From Baseline = (Postoperative Week 1,2, or 6 Scores) - (Baseline Scores).
Time frame: Baseline and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: From the day of hospitalization to the day of discharge
Proportion of Participants With Transfusion Requirements
Time frame: Intra-operative
Proportion of Participants With Wound Complications (ie, Hematoma, Cellulitis, Dehiscence, Superficial or Deep Infection, and Persistent Drainage)
Time frame: Day 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6
Proportion of Participants With Any Adverse Events or Serious Injuries During or After Surgery
Time frame: Day 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical Therapist
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without Assistance
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walker
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking Cane
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Wheelchair
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of Bed
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to Walk
The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Time frame: 60 days