52-104 week off-therapy second extension to study CSPP100A2365 to assess growth and development in pediatric hypertensive patients previously treated with aliskiren in studies SPP100A2365 and SPP100A2365E1
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
106
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Change in Weight Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to Long Term (LT) Visit 18 (Week 104) for the Enrolled to Follow-up Set (EFS)
Participant weight was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension). Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg in indoor clothing, but without shoes.
Time frame: Baseline to LT Visit 18 (Week 104): 2 years (104 weeks)
Change in Height Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to Long Term (LT) Visit 18 (Week 104) for the EFS
Participant height was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension).
Time frame: Baseline to LT Visit 18 (Week 104): 2 years (104 weeks)
Change in BMI Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to Long Term (LT) Visit 18 (Week 104) for the EFS
Participant height and weight was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension). BMI was derived.
Time frame: Baseline to LT Visit 18 (Week 104): 2 years (104 weeks)
Change in Neurocognitive Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to Long Term (LT) Visit 18 (Week 104) for the EFS
All participants who were determined to have secondary hypertension in the core study and had a Baseline (Visit 2) standardized neurocognitive assessment in the core study received follow-up neurocognitive assessments at LT Visit 18 and LT Visit 19 with the same tool. The neurocognitive assessment of development included assessment of the following abilities: Attention, Processing speed, Working memory, and Motor speed. For Numbers (Forward and Backward Raw Score), Visual Matching (Number Correct), Sequences (Total Raw Score): positive change indicates a numerical increase, which is considered a better outcome/improvement; negative change/numerical decrease is considered a worse outcome/decline. For Visual Matching (Time to Complete), Time Tapping (Right and Left Hands), and Timed Gait: positive change indicates a numerical increase, which is considered a worse outcome/decline; negative change/numerical decrease is considered a better outcome/improvement.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Dalton, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Lewiston, Idaho, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
...and 15 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to LT Visit 18 (Week 104): 2 years (104 weeks)
Change in Weight Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to End of Study (EOS) by Hypertension Group
Participant weight was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension). Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg in indoor clothing, but without shoes.
Time frame: Baseline to EOS (2 to 3 years). EOS was defined as LT Visit 18 (Week 104) and LT Visit 19 (Week 156) for participants with primary and secondary hypertension, respectively.
Change in Height Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to EOS by Hypertension Group
Participant height was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension).
Time frame: Baseline to EOS (2 to 3 years). EOS was defined as LT Visit 18 (Week 104) and LT Visit 19 (Week 156) for participants with primary and secondary hypertension, respectively.
Change in BMI Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to EOS by Hypertension Group
Participant weight and height was measured at Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core study), LT Visit 17, LT Visit 18 (\[Week 104\] only for participants identified in the core study as having primary hypertension), and LT Visit 19 (\[Week 156\] only for participants identified in the core study as having secondary hypertension). Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg in indoor clothing, but without shoes. BMI was derived.
Time frame: Baseline to EOS (2 to 3 years). EOS was defined as LT Visit 18 (Week 104) and LT Visit 19 (Week 156) for participants with primary and secondary hypertension, respectively.
Change in Neurocognitive Assessments From Baseline (Visit 2 of the Core Study) to EOS by Hypertension Group
All participants who were determined to have secondary hypertension in the core study and had a Baseline (Visit 2) standardized neurocognitive assessment in the core study received follow-up neurocognitive assessments at LT Visit 18 and LT Visit 19 with the same tool. The neurocognitive assessment of development included assessment of the following abilities: Attention, Processing speed, Working memory, and Motor speed. For Numbers (Forward and Backward Raw Score), Visual Matching (Number Correct), Sequences (Total Raw Score): positive change indicates a numerical increase, which is considered a better outcome/improvement; negative change/numerical decrease is considered a worse outcome/decline. For Visual Matching (Time to Complete), Time Tapping (Right and Left Hands), and Timed Gait: positive change indicates a numerical increase, which is considered a worse outcome/decline; negative change/numerical decrease is considered a better outcome/improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to EOS (3 years). EOS was defined as LT Visit 19 (Week 156) for participants with secondary hypertension.