Study TLK199.2107 is a multicenter, single arm, open-label Phase 2 study of oral ezatiostat (Telintra®) in patients with lenalidomide (Revlimid®) refractory or resistant, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent, Low to Intermediate-1 IPSS risk, del5q Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).
Study TLK199.2107 is a multicenter, single arm, open-label Phase 2 study of oral ezatiostat (Telintra®) in patients with lenalidomide (Revlimid®) refractory or resistant, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent, Low to Intermediate-1 IPSS risk, del5q Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Independence from red blood cell transfusions, improvement in the levels of red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets, and the response of the bone marrow were evaluated. Patients received a starting dose of 2000 mg total daily dose in divided doses (1000 mg orally twice daily for three weeks (21 days) on therapy followed by a one-week (7 days) off therapy rest period in four-week (28 days) treatment cycles. Patients continued treatment until documentation of lack of MDS response, MDS progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal from the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2
Three weeks of treatment with ezatiostat at 2000 mg per day in divided doses followed by a one week rest period in four-week treatment cycles.
Loyola University
Maywood, Illinois, United States
SIU School of Medicine, Simmons Cancer Center
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid (HI-E) rate
Hematologic Improvement response will be assessed per the IWG MDS response criteria (2006)
Time frame: At 8, 16, 24, and 32 weeks of treatment
RBC Transfusion independence (TI) rate
Time frame: At 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 & 32 weeks of treatment
Hematologic Improvement-Neutrophil (HI-N) rate
Hematologic Improvement response will be assessed per the IWG MDS response criteria (2006)
Time frame: At 8, 16, 24, & 32 weeks of treatment
Hematologic Improvement-Platelet (HI-P) rate
Hematologic Improvement response will be assessed per the IWG MDS response criteria (2006)
Time frame: At 8, 16, 24, & 32 weeks of treatment
Unilineage, bilineage, trilineage, and overall HI response rate
Time frame: 2 years
Cytogenetic response rate
Time frame: 16 weeks, 48 weeks and at the time of first HI response
Duration of response
Time frame: 2 years
Safety of ezatiostat in this MDS population
Recording and grading of AEs using NCI-CTCAE v4.03
Time frame: At 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 & 32 weeks of treatment
Evaluation of the relationship between HI-E response, gene expression profiling and response-related variables
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Time frame: 2 years