The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or ROM differences in total knee arthroplasty with standard NexGen LPS prosthesis and NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis.
We therefore hypothesized: (1) the survival of the NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis is better than standard NexGen LPS prosthesis; (2) knee function and range of motion after clinical assessment will be better in the NexGen LPS-Flex group; and (3) the incidence of osteolysis will be lower in the NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis than standard NexGTne LPS prosthesis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
111
NexGen legacy posterior stabilized high-flexion (NexGen LPS-Flex) total knee system
NexGen legacy posterior stabilized standard (NexGen LPS) total knee system
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hosptial
Seoul, South Korea
Improvement in Knee Society Knee Score
change in knee score will be compared with initial score, until mean follow up of 10.3 year
Time frame: 10 years
Improvement in the range of motion
change in the range of motion of knee joint will be compared with the initial value, until mean follow up of 10.3 years
Time frame: 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.