Comparison of Two Strategies for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation - a comparison of ablation guided by Cartomerge and NavX Fusion. 3D mapping systems are widely used in catheter ablation of AF. Integration of a previously acquired image of the left atrium into the electroanatomical (EA) map offers several potential advantages, including visualisation of the complex anatomy of the left atrium, reduction of fluoroscopy time and improved results . The two most widely used systems are Cartomerge (Biosense Webster, etc) and NavX Fusion (SJM, etc). Although both systems have been independently validated, their clinical utility has not previously been directly compared in a randomised trial
Patients are randomised to either NavX Fusion or Cartomerge. They undergo a standard catheter ablation procedure and data is collected. Both systems are routinely used in our clinical practise. This is a comparison trial of 2 mapping technologies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
101
Using NavX Fusion to guide catheter ablation
Guidance of catheter ablation using Cartomerge guidance
Barts and the London NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
AF recurrence
Documentation of symptomatic arrhythmia or arrhythmia on a 7 day holter monitor at six-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Lesion distance from CT shell
Establish accuracy of lesion placement in relation to previously acquired CT shell to act as an indicator of guidance accuracy
Time frame: At completion of catheter ablation procedure (distance at defined procedure endpoint) (between 0 - 6 hours after procedure start)
Procedural time points
Measurement of all procedural time points during procedure, along with x-ray dose and screening times.
Time frame: At start, during and end of inpatient catheter ablation procedure. (between 0 & 6 hours after start of ablation procedure)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.