This study aims to investigate the combination of panitumumab and a 5-FU-based RCTX in patients with locally advanced KRAS wild-type rectal cancer.
Significant progress in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer has been achieved during the last decade. This includes surgical techniques as the widespread implementation of total mesorectal excision as well as preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTX). The results of the recent randomized trials led to a current standard in which most (radio-) oncologists now use continuous-infusion 5-FU concomitantly with preoperative radiotherapy. It has been demonstrated that this provides improved tumor downstaging and local control; however, no significant differences have yet been achieved in the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates. Thus, the challenge is to integrate more effective systemic therapy into the combined-modality programs. The combination of RCTX with novel chemotherapeutic agents like oxaliplatin and irinotecan in phase I/II trials suggested higher rates of histopathological complete remission (pCR) compared with 5-FU RCTX alone. However, due to the lack of results from randomized trials, to date no improvement of the long-term outcomes could be demonstrated, moreover, for some studies the increased pCR rate was associated with an increase in toxicity. Another strategy to improve outcome is to incorporate newer, biologically active, targeted therapies into established RCTX regimens. Because of its key role in signalling proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis and angiogenesis the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a promising target of antitumor treatment. To date a few clinical phase I/II studies of preoperative RCTX have been initiated to evaluate EGFR inhibitors as radiosensitizer in rectal cancer. These trials demonstrated that a combination of cetuximab and RCTX could be safely applied without dose compromises of the respective treatment components. However, the pCR rates could not be improved in these studies. Given the strong preclinical rationale to combine EGFR inhibition with RCTX in rectal cancer patients, this study aims to investigate the combination of panitumumab and a 5-FU-based RCTX in patients with locally advanced KRAS wild-type rectal cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
48
Intravenous (IV), Panitumumab 6 mg/kg BW q2w d1-d57 (5 times total); begin on day 1 (run-in-phase) and subsequent application on days 15, 29 43 and 57.
National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT)
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Krankenhaus Nord West, Radioonkologische Klinik
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
Histopathological complete response rate (pCR)
pCR determined by means of the resection specimens
Time frame: at week 14 after tumor resection
Objective tumor response rate assessed by MRI of the pelvis (incl. RECIST)
Time frame: at day 14 and week 12
Metabolic tumor response rate assessed by means of changes in the standardized uptake values (SUV) using FDG-PET-CT (incl. RECIST)
Time frame: day 14 and at week 14 before surgery
Pathological tumor regression grades will be classified according to Becker
Time frame: at week 14 after surgery
Quality of Life (QoL) will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in combination with the colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionaire module (QLQ-CR29)
Time frame: between day 0 and week 18 end of study
distant metastases-free survival
distant metastases-free survival after EOS
Time frame: during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO
relapse-free survival
relapse-free survival after end of study
Time frame: during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO
overall survival
overall survival after EOS
Time frame: during follow up every 6 months until death or until 2 years after LPO
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.