The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of HYD tablets 20 to 120 mg once-daily dose compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain uncontrolled by their current stable analgesic regimen
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
905
Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily
Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily
Mean Pain Intensity for "Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours" Score
Mean pain intensity for "average pain over the last 24 hours" score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time frame: Week 12
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance Subscale
The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered 12-item assessment designed to measure key aspects of sleep. It includes a sleep problems index and 6 subscales - sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, and quantity of sleep. The sleep disturbance subscale comprised the responses to questions 1, 3, 7, and 8 on the assessment. The individual responses for each question were recorded on a 5-point scale with options ranging from 1 - "all of the time" to 5 - "none of the time". Sleep disturbance scores were transformed linearly on a scale of 0-100. A higher value indicates a better score; therefore, a higher score indicates a better sleep pattern.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The proportion of subjects responding "very much improved" and "much improved" was summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Week 12
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline
A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alliance Clinical Research
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Redpoint Research
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Genova Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Quality of Life Medical & Research Center, LLC
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Redpoint Research
Tucson, Arizona, United States
ACRI-Phase 1, LLC
Anaheim, California, United States
Orange County Research Institute
Anaheim, California, United States
United Clinical Research Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, United States
...and 92 more locations
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline
A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12