This study will investigate the effect of dosing paedeatric asthmatic subjects with GW642444, an orally inhaled long-acting agonist of the β2-adrenoceptor.
This study will investigate the effect of dosing with 25 μg GW642444, an orally inhaled long-acting agonist of the β2-adrenoceptor, in asthmatic subjects aged 5 to 11. GW642444 is currently under development as the long-acting beta-agonist component of a combination product containing an inhaled corticosteroid and a longacting beta-agonist. Subjects will receive a single dose via a novel dry powder inhaler, then 7 days once-daily repeat dosing following a washout period. The study will be a randomized two-way crossover, with a placebo control. Approximately 26 subjects will be recruited to this study, with the aim that 20 will complete the study. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and glucose and potassium levels will be investigated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
28
GSK Investigational Site
Cypress, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Normal, Illinois, United States
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in deciding whether reporting is appropriate in other situations. Refer to the General AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Time frame: From the start of study medication until Week 11 (Visit 8)/Early Withdrawal
Basophil, Eosinophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Total Neutrophil, Platelet, and White Blood Cell Count Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, platelets, and white blood cell (WBC) count at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin and MCHC at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Reticulocyte and Red Blood Cell (RBC) Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of reticulocytes and RBCs at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, United States
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Hematocrit Value at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Hematocrit is a measure of the percentage of the volume of the whole blood that is composed of red blood cells, as determined by separation of red blood cells from the plasma (usually by centrifugation). Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) Value at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of MCV at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) Value at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of MCH at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALT, ALP, AST, and GGT at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Albumin and Total Protein Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and total protein at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Calcium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Content/Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide content/bicarbonate (CO2/BI), glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea/BUN at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Uric Acid Values at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, and uric acid at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Peak Expiratory Flow on Day 1, Day 8, and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF is calculated as the maximum of three readings taken at each timepoint for each participant. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement at Day 1 for the respective period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8, and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Day 1, Day 8, and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
SBP and DBP were measured at Day 1, Day 8, and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. PD=post-dose. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement at Day 1 for the respective period. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8, and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Maximum Heart Rate at Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Heart rate (HR) was measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. hr=hour. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Weighted Mean Heart Rate at Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Heart rate (HR) was measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. hr=hour. Weighted means were derived using the linear trapezoidal rule. Actual relative times were used for the calculation except where actual times were missing. If any actual times were missing, planned relative times were used for these observations. For 0-8 hr parameters, treatment, period, participant Baseline, and period Baseline were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. For 0-2 hr parameters, treatment, period, day (1 and 14), participant Baseline, period Baseline, and treatment\*day interaction were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Maximum QTcF at Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
The electrocardiographic (ECG) parameter QT duration corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) was measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. hr=hour. For 0-8 hr parameters, treatment, period, participant Baseline, and period Baseline were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. For 0-2 hr parameters, treatment, period, day (1 and 14), participant Baseline, period Baseline, and treatment\*day interaction were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Weighted Mean QTcF at Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
The electrocardiographic (ECG) parameter QT duration corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) was measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. hr=hour. Actual relative times were used for the calculation except where actual times were missing. If any actual times were missing, planned relative times were used for these observations. For 0-8 hr parameters, treatment, period, participant Baseline, and period Baseline were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. For 0-2 hr parameters, treatment, period, day (1 and 14), participant Baseline, period Baseline, and treatment\*day interaction were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg (n=28).
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-8) on Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Area under the concentration-time (AUC) curve from time zero (pre-dose) to the last time AUC(0-t) and from time zero to 8 hours AUC(0-8) of quantifiable concentration of VI on Day 14 of the respective treatment period was measured. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose for participants who were \>=20 kilograms and pre-dose; 10 min and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose for participants who were \<=20 kilograms on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the Pharmacokinetic Population.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Cmax on Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose for participants who were \>=20 kilograms and pre-dose; 10 min and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose for participants who were \<=20 kilograms on Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Tmax, t1/2, and t at Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
tmax is defined as the time to reach the observed maximum concentration, t1/2 is defined as the time required to reduce the plasma concentration to one half its initial value, and t is defined as the time of the last observed quantifiable concentration on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose for participants who were \>=20 kilograms and pre-dose; 10 min and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose for participants who were \<=20 kilograms on Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Blood Glucose and Potassium on Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
Blood glucose and potassium values were measured on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose for participants who were \>=20 kilograms and pre-dose; 10 min and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose for participants who were \<=20 kilograms on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. . Weighted means were derived using the linear trapezoidal rule. Actual relative times were used for the calculation except where actual times were missing. If any actual times were missing, planned relative times were used for these observations. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg. Treatment and period were fitted as fixed effects and participant was fitted as a random effect.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Average Oropharyngeal Cross-sectional Area on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for the study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Distance of Assessment on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for this study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Distance of assessment is defined as the distance (length measured in centimeters \[cm\]) estimated to be from the lips to the larynx. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Oropharyngeal Volume on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for this study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Oropharyngeal volume is defined as the volume (centimeters cubed \[cm\^3\]) of the mouth and throat estimated to be from the lips to the larynx. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Average Flow Rate and Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (PIFR) on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Average flow rate is defined as the average inspiratory flow rate (Liters \[L\]/min) across the inhalation profile when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler. PIFR is defined as the Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (L/min) of the inhalation profile when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler.The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the average flow rate and PIFR were determined. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Inhalation Time on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Inhalation time is defined as the duration of the inhalation(s) when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler. The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the inhalation time was determined. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Inhaled Volume on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Inhaled volume is defined as the volume of air (Liters) inhaled during the inhalation across the resistance of the inhaler. The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the inhalaled volume was determined. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Peak Pressure Drop on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Peak pressure drop is defined as the maximum pressure drop (kilopascal \[kPa\]) achieved during inhalation across the resistance of the inhaler. The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was calculated for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and used for subsequent modeling and prediction of dose emission attributes. Subject 2308 received VI 25 µg in both treatment periods, and contributed twice to the summary of VI 25 µg.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Total Emitted Dose (TED) on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
The total emitted dose (TED) is defined as the mass (micrograms) of the nominal dose that passes beyond the throat. The recorded inhalation profiles of the participants and the mouth-throat (oropharyngeal) models of the sizes that approximated to pharyngometry measurements of the participants were used in conjunction with the electronic Lung (eLung) for in vitro assessment. The eLung is a breathing simulator that replicates the selected inhalation profile with an active inhaler placed at the lips end of the selected ororpharyngeal model. After the dose is emitted from the inhaler, the analysis and assay of throat deposition and material passing beyond the throat was used to derive the nominal, minimum, and maximum predicted total emitted dose.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)
Ex-throat Dose (ETD) and ETD <2 Microns on Day 1 and Day 14 of the Respective Treatment Period
The ex-throat dose (ETD) and the "nominal ETD" is the mass (micrograms) of active investigational material that passes beyond the throat, nominal being the mean.The recorded inhalation profiles of the participants and the mouth-throat (oropharyngeal) models of the sizes that approximated to pharyngometry measurements of the participants were used in conjunction with the electronic Lung (eLung) for in vitro assessment. The eLung is a breathing simulator that replicates the selected inhalation profile with an active inhaler placed at the lips end of the selected ororpharyngeal model. After the dose is emitted from the inhaler, the analysis and assay of throat deposition and material passing beyond the throat was used to derive the nominal, minimum, and maximum predicted ETD and ETD \<2 microns.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 49)