Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Addiction Treatment

Overview

The purpose of this phase of the study is to further assess the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as delivered by routine addiction counselors, and to compare CBT for PTSD with individual addiction counseling (IAC) on our primary outcomes.

The main hypothesis being tested is that a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can improve treatment retention and outcomes for both posttraumatic stress and substance use disorders. The investigators have completed a Safety \& Practicality Study and a Feasibility Study and both studies found that CBT for PTSD was safe and effective in reducing PTSD symptoms, improving retention, and in reducing substance use. The present study proposes to continue testing the hypotheses by evaluating and comparing the PTSD, retention and substance use outcomes resulting from CBT versus a control condition. This is termed the "Pilot Trial" phase of behavioral therapy development and requires comparing the investigational treatment (CBT) with a control treatment, within the context of addiction treatment-as-usual (intensive outpatient programs or methadone maintenance clinic settings). The results of this study will then be used to develop a RO1 grant application to NIDA to support a Stage II efficacy study (randomized controlled trial). Our objective is to test the following specific hypotheses: CBT for PTSD (plus addiction treatment-as-usual) vs. IAC (plus addiction treatment-as-usual): 1) Reduces PTSD symptoms; 2) Improves addiction treatment retention; and, 3) Reduces substance use and severity. A hierarchy of effects is hypothesized. The target of the CBT is PTSD symptoms, which if reduced, will favorably leverage both treatment retention and substance use, above and beyond the equivalence in type and amount of treatment in both conditions. This study involves is a two-group repeated measures design. Within the NIDA stage model, it is a randomized, pilot trial with a matched-attention control condition. The investigators plan to examine outcomes associated with the intervention versus control condition among patients receiving outpatient addiction treatment services (intensive outpatient program or methadone maintenance program). The investigators will employ assessments at baseline, during therapy, post-therapy, and three-month follow-up. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to the study CBT therapy (plus addiction treatment-as-usual) or the matched attention control condition (individual addiction counseling \[IAC\] plus addiction treatment-as-usual), and all will be followed for the research assessments regardless of whether they drop out of treatment early (whenever possible). Patients admitted to the participating addiction treatment programs are routinely screened for PTSD using a brief self-report survey, the PTSD Checklist (PCL). These forms are collected by clinical staff of the treatment program and scored for PTSD diagnostic criteria. Patients scoring 44 or greater on the PCL are approached by a clinic staff about potential interest in the study. If they wish to learn more about the study, the research coordinator (an on-site employee) is contacted, a suitable time arranged, and the patient engaged in the process of informed consent. If consent is granted, the subject completes the baseline assessment. The baseline assessment consists of measures gathered via interview by a member of the research team, self-administered surveys completed directly by the subject, and review of the subject's medical record to extract demographic, substance use, and treatment history information, as well as chart diagnoses. The interview portion of the assessment consists of: * Standardized interviews designed to assess PTSD and borderline personality disorder, another commonly associated psychiatric disorder: Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the SCID-Axis II borderline personality disorder. * A urine screen and breathalyzer to test for alcohol and other drugs. * Standardized follow-back method for gathering data on recent alcohol and drug use: Time-line Follow-back Calendar (TLFB). The self-administered portion of the assessment consists of measures designed to assess: * Depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II \[BDI-II\]) * Anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory \[BAI\]) * Alcohol and drug use, as well as associated problems in other life areas such as medical, employment, legal, social, and psychiatric (Addiction Severity Index \[ASI\]) * Level of risk for HIV (HIV-risk Screening Instrument \[HSI\]) * Treatment utilization (Recent Treatment Survey). If the subject continues to meet criteria for PTSD (i.e., the CAPS interview confirms diagnosis of DSM-IV PTSD, with symptom severity at 44 or higher), he or she is randomized to receive the study CBT therapy or the control condition (IAC). At monthly (every four weeks) intervals during the provision of CBT or IAC, the subject will complete the RTS and a trauma event checklist based on the PCL, and will be tested for alcohol use (breathalyzer) and drug use (urine screen). The subject will also complete the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI - client version) at the first monthly assessment only. Upon completion of the CBT or IAC, a member of the research team will re-interview the subject. The post-therapy assessment (approx. 3-months post-baseline) will consist of the same measures administered at baseline, with the exception of the borderline personality disorder interview. The final research assessment is conducted three months after the post-therapy assessment. This assessment will consist of the same measures used at the post-therapy assessment, along with the trauma event checklist (to assess for re-traumatization). The investigators plan to enroll approximately 100 subjects in the study. Based on our previous data, the investigators expect that 60% of referred subjects will actually meet eligibility criteria, leaving 60 subjects to be randomized (30 to CBT and 30 to IAC). The subject outcome and program experiences with the protocol will be used in planning the subsequent federal grant application for a randomized controlled trial.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (6)

Outcomes