Endobronchial lung cancer tend to manifest in three different patterns. It can present as a bulky, exophytic mass lesion, submucosal infiltration or extrinsic compression from peribronchial disease. Bronchoscopy with differents techniques as forceps biopsy, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing is recognized as the gold standard to diagnose central airways lung neoplasms. Some authors suggested that the addition of endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) to these conventional diagnostic methods may increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy in submucosal and peribronchial disease but few prospective trials have been performed and this procedure is still underutilized in many centers. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) showed to improve yield of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal nodes and pulmonary peripheral lesions, reducing the number of inadequate specimens and costs. However, its utility during endobronchial needle aspiration has not been substantiated. This prospective study has two primary objectives: to compare the sensitivity of ROSE-EBNA with that of the conventional technique and to investigate the diagnostic yield of endobronchial needle aspiration and its contribution to CDM in the evaluation of patients with endobronchial lesions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
134
The patients in this arm will undergo: A) bronchoscopy, endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) with a cytologic needle (21 gauge), at least three forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing in this procedural sequence with rapid on-site evaluation B) if A will be negative transthoracic needle aspiration or surgical biopsy will be performed C) if A and B will be negative follow-up with computed tomography or positron emission tomography and computed tomography
The patients in this arm will undergo: A) bronchoscopy, endobronchial needle aspiration (EBNA) with a cytologic needle (21 gauge), at least three forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing in this procedural sequence. B)if A will be negative transthoracic needle aspiration or surgical biopsy will be performed C) if A and B will be negative follow-up with computed tomography or positron emission tomography and computed tomography
Clinica di Malattie dell'Apparato Respiratorio, Ospedale San Paolo, Università degli Studi di Milano
Milan, Milan, Italy
the sensitivity of the technique of endobronchial needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer
to determinate the sensitivity of endobronchial needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation compared to the conventional technique for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer
Time frame: 10 day
the diagnostic yield of adding endobronchial needle aspiration (with and without rapid on-site evaluation) to conventional diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer
to investigate the diagnostic yield of adding endobronchial needle aspiration (with and without rapid on-site evaluation) to conventional diagnostic methods versus conventional diagnostic methods (bronchoscopy with forceps biopsies, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing) for the diagnosis of endobronchial lung cancer
Time frame: 10 days
the impact of rapid on-site evaluation on number of passes during endobronchial needle aspiration
study if the presence of rapid on-site evaluation during endobronchial needle aspiration may reduce the number of passes suggested by literature
Time frame: 30 min
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.