The study aims to show the technical feasibility of the suprapubic urinary diversion after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) and has a greater comfort for the patients with at least the same catheter complication rate in comparison to the urethral urinary diversion.
Patients are randomized 1:1 in the different arms Recording of QoL measured by visual analogue ( pain )scale,EORTC QlQ -C 30 and QLQ - PR 25 questionnaires, incontinence rate, complication rate regarding insufficiency and strictures of vesicourethral anastomoses and urinary tract infection; demand of re-catheterization due to urinary retention and demand of antispasmodics
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
106
transurethral catheter after EERPE/ RALP
suprapubic catheter after EERPE /RALP
University Hospital, Urological department
Düsseldorf, Germany
Superiority of suprapubic catheter after EERPE
Superiority of suprapubic catheter versus transurethral catheter regarding QoL /Patient comfort
Time frame: 2nd postoperative day
Comparison of QoL in both arms measured by visual analogue (pain) scale
Comparison of QoL in both arms measured by visual analogue (pain) scale, EORTC QlQ -C 30 and QLQ - PR 25 questionnaires, incontinence rate, complication rate regarding insufficiency and strictures of vesicourethral anastomoses and urinary tract infection; demand of re-catheterization due to urinary retention and demand of antispasmodics.
Time frame: 1st and 3rd until 5th postoperative day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.