Continuous accurate unobtrusive respiratory rate monitoring may lead to improved patient outcomes, as respiratory rate is thought to be a sensitive marker of patient deterioration. Currently systems are not suitable for long term monitoring, particularly in ambulant patients as they are too restrictive. To ensure that our algorithms are suitable for use in a clinical context we need to demonstrate their performance not only in the optimal situation, healthy volunteers at rest, but also in more challenging situations such as where the person being monitored is moving and also in patients who have conditions which may affect their physiology in such a way that the accuracy of the respiration rate estimation may be affected. No previous study has systematically tested algorithms deriving respiratory rate from either the ECG or the photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms in a real -world setting. The algorithms work by looking for changes in intervals between heartbeats and also changes in the sizes of the ECG and PPG waveforms, both of which may be caused by respiration. These changes tend to diminish with increasing age and also conditions which alter the chest movement and cardiac reflexes. Thus it is important to test our algorithms' accuracy in participants exhibiting these conditions. It is also important to ensure that the calculations of respiratory rate are accurate across a range of heart rates and respiratory rates. Our testing covers all these variables.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
130
Recording of 12 lead ECG
Recording of lying and standing blood pressure
Recording of chest wall movement
Done during deep breathing and a valsalva manoeuvre
For 10 mins
Recording of ECG and Pulse oximeter waveform during exercise
St Thomas' Hospital
London, United Kingdom
The coefficient of variation for each respiration rate algorithm
The algorithms to be tested are: one which calculates respiration rate (RR) from ECG only, one which calculates RR from PPG only, one which calculates RR from simultaneous ECG and PPG
Time frame: 5-6 months
The coefficient of variation for the respiration rate calculated from a second pulse oximeter
Participants will wear two different PPG monitors to assess whether PPG monitors from different manufacturers introduce artefactual changes to the PPG morphology
Time frame: 5-6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.