Birth control pills are the most commonly used method of birth control. The purpose of this research study is to examine whether birth control pills change heart disease risk and how the body handles blood sugar when given to different women.
The oral contraceptive pill is the most commonly used birth control method. It is debated whether the birth control pill affects how the body handles insulin and sugar, or whether the pill changes heart disease risk. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether certain factors, such as how the body processes hormones, and demographic factors (e.g. body weight and race), influence how the pill affects the handling of insulin and sugar, and heart health.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
47
Ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg and norgestimate 0.25 mg (oral) will be taken as one tablet daily for 21 days per month followed by a 7-day pill-free period per cycle. Duration of the study is for 6 cycles of this birth control pill.
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity
Insulin sensitivity from Frequently sampled IV glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT), change from baseline to 6 months. Higher values indicate better insulin sensitivity
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Flow-mediated Vasodilatation
Change Flow-mediated Vasodilatation from baseline to 6 months. Higher values indicate less cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness
Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness from baseline to 6 months, measured on the right carotid artery, posterior. Lower values indicate better cardiovascular risk profile
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Acute Insulin Response to Glucose
Acute Insulin Response to Glucose values obtained from FSIVGTT models--higher values indicate better insulin response
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Glucose Effectiveness
Obtained from FSIVGTT models--higher values indicate better effectiveness of glucose inducing its own disposition
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Disposition Index at 6 Months
Modeled from FISVGTT--higher values indicate better glucose disposition
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at 6 Months
Higher fasting insulin values indicate an increased metabolic risk
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose at 6 Months
Higher fasting glucose indicate an increased metabolic risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Areas-under-the-curve for Insulin at 6 Months
Measured during oral glucose tolerance test. Higher values indicate increased metabolic risk
Time frame: Baselines, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Areas-under-the-curve for Glucose
Measured during oral glucose tolerance test. Higher values indicate increased metabolic risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months
Higher value indicates increased cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in HDL at 6 Months
Lower values indicate increased cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index in 6 Months
Higher values indicate higher metabolic risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Higher value indicates higher cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in LDL From Baseline to 6 Months
Higher value indicates higher cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to 6 Months
Higher values indicate higher cardiovascular risk
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months