With Contrast Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS) cancer induced neovascularisation can be visualised with the potential to improve ultrasound imaging for prostate cancer detection and localisation significantly. The past years numerous studies have been performed with CEUS, all basing their results on subjective judgement of the investigator. CEUS image interpretation is difficult and requires a well-trained expert. To overcome these difficulties CEUS quantification techniques can be of use. The techniques used in this protocol have been developed in cooperation with the Technical University in Eindhoven (TU/e) and BRACCO, Geneva. The investigators hypothesize improvement of the PCa detection rate with quantification, compared with subjective CEUS interpretation and known numbers in literature. Also a comparison between quantification results and tumour differentiation grade (Gleason score) will be made, the investigators hypothesize a positive correlation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
208
2.4 ml Bolus Injection by intravenous canule. Multi-repeatable (up to 4 bolus) if necessary.
AMC University Hospital
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Quantification prediction compared with prostate biopsy histology
Prostate cancer detection rate by quantification. Answering the question: What is the difference in, for malignancy suspicious, areas between CEUS quantification and subjective interpretation in relation to the histological biopsy results?
Time frame: 3 years
Quantification prediction compared with prostate biopsy histology
Prostate cancer Gleason score compared to quantification results Answering the question: Is there a relation between Gleason score and quantification results?
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.