This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ADX-N05 compared to placebo in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
33
Pulmonary Associates
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Clinical Research Group of St. Petersburg
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Neurotrials Research, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Change From Baseline in the Average Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Following Two Weeks of Treatment With ADX-N05 vs. Two Weeks of Treatment With Placebo
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The change from baseline in the mean sleep latency from the MWT was the average of sleep latency from the four trials of the MWT.
Time frame: Baseline up to 2 weeks post-dose.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 1 and 3
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 3 post-dose.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 2 and 4
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sleep Disorders Center of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
SleepMed of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, United States
The Center for Sleep and Wake Disorders
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
Mercy St. Anne Sleep Disorders Center
Toledo, Ohio, United States
SleepMed of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Future Search Trials of Neurology
Austin, Texas, United States
Sleep Medicine Associates of Texas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 1 and 3
The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 3 post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 2 and 4
The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 2 and Week 4 post-dose.