Recently a novel stimulation design was developed, called burst stimulation. In a non-placebo controlled pilot study burst stimulation seemed superior to tonic stimulation over a period extending more than 2 years, and even though an incidental finding, this design seemed capable of suppressing pain without mandatory induction of paresthesias. This permits for the first time to scientifically prove that spinal cord stimulation is better than placebo stimulation. A study was therefore initiated to find out whether spinal cord stimulation is indeed capable of suppressing neuropathic limb pain in a placebo controlled way.
Patients receive three type of stimulation (burst, tonic and sham). We want to compare these different stimulation protocol to verify which one is the one the patient prefer the most and have the least side-effects (paresthesia)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
15
test different settings of stimulation
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Belgium
Visual Analogue Scales for pain back, pain limb, pain general and paresthesia
VAS scores for pain now, worst pain, least pain and pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.