Comparing efficacy and safety of isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) using a Cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a ThermoCool catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of isolating the PVs with either the cryoballoon or a RF ablation technique with a ThermoCool catheter, a system which can be regarded as standard for ablation. In total 762 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has been randomized for either radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon. With both techniques, PV isolation will be performed. Primary end point of the trial is the time to first recurrence of atrial arrhythmias or prescription of anti-arrhythmic drugs after a blanking period of three months. Treatment success will be evaluated by using weekly electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring (transtelephonic transmission/Tele-ECG) and using Holter electrocardiograms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
769
Device: ArcticFront® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System with the FlexCath Steerable Sheath or ArcticFront® Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System with the FlexCath Steerable Sheath or any future development generations of this product line, provided they are CE marked and the centre has the experience of at least 10 procedures before including a patient into the study.
Device:NaviStar® ThermoCool® Irrigated Tip Ablation Catheter in combination with 3D mapping system CARTO or any future development generations of this product line, provided they are CE marked and the centre has the experience of at least 10 procedures before including a patient into the study.
Na Homolce Hospital, Cardiology
Prague, Czechia
Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmias or Prescription of Anti-arrhythmic Drug or Re-ablation After a Blanking Period of Three Months After the Initial Ablation Procedure
Number of subjects reporting a primary efficacy endpoint
Time frame: 33 months
Number of Subjects With a Primary Safety Event. A Primary Safety Event Includes a Composite of Death (Including Cardiovascular Death), All-cause Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest.
Time frame: 33 months
All-cause Death
Time frame: 33 months
Arrhythmia-related Death
Time frame: 33 months
Total Procedure Duration
Time frame: Through the initial ablation procedure
Total Time of Fluoroscopy
Time frame: Fluoroscopy meter time through the initial ablation procedure
Number of Subjects Reporting a Cardiovascular Hospitalization Over the Duration of the Study.
Time frame: 33 months
Number of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations
The total number of cardiovascular hospitalizations reported over the duration of the study.
Time frame: 33 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital Henri Mondor CHU, Service de Cardiologie
Créteil, France
CHU Lyon, Départment de Rythmologie, Hospital Cardiologique Pradel
Lyon, France
Centre Chirurgical Ambroise Paré
Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
La Clinique Pasteur, 45 Avenue de Lombez
Toulouse, France
Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Germany
Klinik für Kardiologie II mit interventioneller Elektrophysiologie
Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien - CCB
Frankfurt, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Greifswald Elektrophysiologie
Greifswald, Germany
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, Germany
...and 9 more locations