A pilot study to determine the ability of a stannous fluoride containing toothpaste to provide immediate and short term relief from dentine Hypersensitivity compared to a control toothpaste.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
118
0.454% stannous fluoride toothpaste
0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste
BioSci Research America, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensivity to Air Stimuli Immediately Following Treatment
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. According to this analog scale hypersensitivity scores for the stimulated tooth is 0, 1, 2 or 3 (lower the score, lower the hypersensitivity).0= no response; 1= response and no discontinuation request; 2= response and discontinuation request; 3= painful response and discontinuation request. Change was calculated as Schiff score immediately after treatment minus Schiff score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after treatment administration
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensitivity to Air Stimuli at Day 3
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth evaluated using Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. According to this analog scale hypersensitivity scores for the stimulated tooth is 0, 1, 2 or 3 (lower the score, lower the hypersensitivity). 0=No participant response to stimulus, 1=responds but will continue, 2=responds and moves or requests discontinuation, 3=Painful response to stimulus, discontinuation requested. Change was Schiff score on Day 3 minus Schiff score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 3
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensitivity to Air Stimuli at Day 14
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth evaluated using Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. According to this analog scale hypersensitivity scores for the stimulated tooth is 0, 1, 2 or 3 (lower the score, lower the hypersensitivity). 0=No participant response to stimulus, 1=responds but will continue, 2=responds and moves or requests discontinuation, 3=Painful response to stimulus, discontinuation requested. Change was Schiff score on Day 14 minus Schiff score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensitity to Touch Stimuli (Tactile) Immediately After Treatment
Measured with an electronic force sensing probe (Yeaple Probe): 10, 20, 30, 40, up to 80 grams of force applied to hypersensitive tooth until pain was elicited. Grams of force needed to elicit pain was recorded as hypersensitivity score for the tooth. The higher the score, the lower the hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity scores on a per study participant basis was recorded as mean scores of all hypersensitive teeth. Change was calculated as mean score immediately after treatment minus mean score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after treatment administration
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensitity to Touch Stimuli (Tactile) Immediately at Day 3
Measured with an electronic force sensing probe (Yeaple Probe): 10, 20, 30, 40, up to 80 grams of force applied to hypersensitive tooth until pain was elicited. Grams of force needed to elicit pain was recorded as hypersensitivity score for the tooth. The higher the score, the lower the hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity scores on a per study participant basis was recorded as mean scores of all hypersensitive teeth. Change was calculated as mean score at Day 3 minus mean score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 3
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Tooth Hypersensitity to Touch Stimuli (Tactile) Immediately at Day 14
Measured with an electronic force sensing probe (Yeaple Probe): 10, 20, 30, 40, up to 80 grams of force applied to hypersensitive tooth until pain was elicited. Grams of force needed to elicit pain was recorded as hypersensitivity score for the tooth. The higher the score, the lower the hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity scores on a per study participant basis was recorded as mean scores of all hypersensitive teeth. Change was calculated as mean score at Day 14 minus mean score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 14