The purpose of this study is to compare the anatomical and visual recovery of eyes with traumatic macular hole (TMH) following either early vitrectomy or 6-month observation.
Patients who received vitrectomy immediately after the injury were compared with patients who were observed for six months for spontaneously closure.The closure rate, foveal microstructure, and final visual acuity were analyzed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
44
"pars plana vitrectomy +internal limiting membrane peeling" done immediately after the identification of the macular hole
Eye Hospital of Hebei Province
Xingtai, Hebei, China
Weifang Eye Hospital
Weifang, Shandong, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Wenzhou Medical College
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
macular hole closure rate
Time frame: 6 month after injury
central foveal thickness
Time frame: 6 month after hole closure
length of inner-segment outer-segment junction defect
Time frame: 6 month after hole closure
final visual acuity
Time frame: 6 month after hole closure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
China - Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, China
Southwest Eye hospital of Third Military Medical University
Chongqing, China
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated Shanghai JiaoTong University school of Medicine
Shanghai, China