It is hypothesized that PEG 2L with citrate and simeticone plus bisacodyl will have similar bowel cleansing efficacy versus PEG 2L with ascorbate. Safety, tolerability, acceptance and compliance of the two reduced volume PEG-based bowel preparation will be also compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
408
Patients will be asked to take 2L of Lovolesse and bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
Patients will asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
IRCCS Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano, Italy
Spedali Civili
Brescia, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
Florence, Italy
Evaluation of the quality of bowel preparation by BBPS
BBPS is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. A score greater than 6 is considered as success. The rate of success will be compared between the two groups.
Time frame: 20 minutes
Difference in mucosal visibility between the two groups
Three point rating scale(0-2).
Time frame: 20 minutes
Number of patients with adverse events
Patient questioning.
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference in tolerability between the two groups
Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who developed GI symptoms related to bowel preparation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference in patients acceptability between the two groups
Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who were willing to repeat the preparation and easy to take the bowel preparation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference in patients compliance between the two groups
Difference in the percentage of patients who took at least 75% of bowel preparation.
Time frame: 24 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Nuovo Regina Margherita
Roma, Italy