This is a comparator study to assess safety and efficacy of Flutiform compared with Fluticasone pMDI and Seretide pMDI in paediatric asthma patients with moderate to severe persistent, reversible asthma.
This is a study involving a 2-4 week run-in phase followed by a 12 week double blind treatment phase. During the run-in phase, all subjects receive Flixotide. In the treatment phase subjects will be randomised to one of the 3 treatment groups and will receive active Flutiform and placebo Flixotide or Active Seretide and placebo Flixotide or active Flixotide and either placebo seretide or placebo Flutiform. Efficacy will be assessed by lung function tests, asthma symptoms, sleep disturbance due to asthma and rescue medication use. Safety will be assessed by adverse events, lab tests, urinary cortisol and vital signs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
498
Unnamed facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Alergologie Skopkova s.r.o
Ostrava-Marianske Hory, Czechia
Illés és Ádám Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Bt.
Kiskunhalas, Hungary
Unnamed facility
New Dehli, India
To show superiority in the efficacy of Flutiform pMDI 50/5μg (2 puffs bid) versus fluticasone pMDI 50 μg (2 puffs bid).
Change from pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) in litres at baseline to 2 hours post-dose FEV1 at the end of the 12 week treatment period.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Show non-inferiority in the efficacy of Flutiform to Seretide
Change from pre-dose FEV1 at baseline to 2 hours post-dose FEV1 at Day 1 and FEV1 AUC0-4 at Day 1 and Week 12 (Flutiform vs Seretide)
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp.z.o.o.
Tarnów, Poland
Spitalul Judetean de Urgenta Deva
Deva, Hunedoara, Romania
Unnamed facility
Moscow, Russia
Unnamed facility
Odesa, Ukraine