The purpose of this study is to compare two common methods of providing respiratory support: nasal continuous airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula to see what effect it has on babies breathing. The investigators also will compare the effects of slightly changing the level of support these two different types of therapy on how easily your baby is breathing. Changes in the level of support and between these two respiratory support modalities are frequently done and are part of the routine care in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Infants who are currently on NCPAP will have pulmonary function testing (PFTs)and esophageal pressure performed while on 2 different settings of NCPAP. These infants will then be transitioned HFNC and will undergo PFTs and esophageal pressure while on different HFNC settings. The infant will then be returned to NCPAP at the same settings they were on prior to any study interventions.
Infants who are currently on HFNC will have pulmonary function testing (PFTs) and esophageal pressure performed while on 2 different settings of HFNC. These infants will then be transitioned NCPAP and will undergo PFTs and esophageal pressure while on 2 different NCPAP settings. The infant will then be returned to HFNC at the same settings they were on prior to any study interventions.
Christiana Care Health System - Christiana Hospital
Newark, Delaware, United States
lung compliance
Is there a difference in pulmonary function tests in infants with respiratory insufficiency being treated with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)?
Time frame: 2 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.