Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance

Menarini Group27 enrolled

Overview

The present pilot study is aimed to obtain preliminary data on the effect of three ascending oral dose levels of nepadutant on the relief of symptoms associated with feeding intolerance. In addition, the assessment of drug exposure (PK assessment) will provide additional information on the dose-effect relationship, thus supporting the dose selection and dosing schedule in the future studies.

Feeding intolerance is a transient neuro-developmental phenomenon affecting 25% to 40% of infant and toddler, with a peak at 6 weeks of age. Feeding problems include mainly vomiting, slow feeding, refusal to eat and colic. Current non pharmacological interventions (e.g. message, restriction in maternal diet in breast-feeding infants) and pharmacological treatments (simethicone, antimuscarinic drugs and antiacids) are largely unsatisfactory. Nepadutant is postulated to have a therapeutic effect in infant colic since it reverts exaggerated intestinal motility and sensitivity induced by different stimuli through the activation of neurokinin-2 receptors, without interferring on the on physiological gastrointestinal transit. This phase IIa study is designed to test in each participant infant two out of three oral doses of nepadutant in order to measure its blood levels, safety and efficacy with each dose level to be given for 7 concecutive days. The experimental clinical phase encompasses the following periods: * Screening period (no study medication), lasting approximately 7 days prior to randomization * Treatment period, lasting fourteen days (7 days fore each dose)with once daily administration * A safety follow-up visit, approximately four weeks after start of treatment.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Colic

Interventions

NepadutantDRUG

Nepadutant oral solution

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMax age: 6 Months

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance. * Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment. * Normal growth. * Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study. Exclusion Criteria: * Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization. * Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization. * Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.

Locations (5)

Arkansas Children's Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit / University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).

Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).

The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).

Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level

The analysis is by treatment - Each infant was treated with two out of three ascending dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg), therefore counted in more than one dose level.

Time frame: up to 4 weeks

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Clearance estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

PopPK Volume estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Ka estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. The PopPK parameter fraction of the dose absorbed (F1) is estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.The results are presented fraction of the absorbed dose with 95% CI of the parameter estimate value

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose