This experimental study will compare impact forces and metabolic cost in runners (N=20; ages 18-45 years, who already use a forefoot strike running gait) in two treadmill running test sessions (shod vs barefoot running)
Specific Aim 1: To identify if differences in metabolic cost exist between barefoot versus cushioned shod FM strikers during an acute bout of running exercise. Hypothesis: The metabolic cost will be higher in the cushioned shod runners with forefoot and midfoot strike compared to the barefoot runners. Specific Aim 2: To identify if differences in peak impact forces exist between barefoot versus cushioned shod runners in forefoot-midfoot (FM) strikers. Hypothesis: Peak impact forces will be higher in the barefoot runners with a forefoot and midfoot striking running style compared to the cushioned shod runners with a forefoot and midfoot striking running style.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
22
shod condition: normal running shoes barefoot condition: running with no shoewear
UF&Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Metabolic Rate During Barefoot and Shod Running
This study will measure the metabolic rate when a person runs on the treadmill with shoes (shod) and without shoes. Each person will run for 20 minutes on the treadmill on two different days, one with and one day without shoes.
Time frame: Study consists of two visits, approximately 2 hours for each visit
Peak Impact Forces During Barefoot and Shod Running
This study will be measuring the peak impact forces that a runner produces when running on the treadmill with shoes (shod) and without shoes. Each person will run for 20 minutes on the treadmill on two different days, one with and one day without shoes.
Time frame: Study consists of two visits, approximately 2 hours for each visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.