Comparison of a Septal Stapler to Suture Closure in Nasal Septoplasty

University of Alberta16 enrolled

Overview

The primary objective of this study is to determine if there is a time savings in the operating room by using a septal stapler instead of suture in closure of primary septoplasty. The secondary objectives are to determine the subjective outcome of patients undergoing closure with the septal stapler instead of suture via questionnaire, and to determine if there is a difference in postoperative complications between groups.

Nasal Septoplasty is the third most common surgical procedure performed by otolaryngologists. The surgery is done to relieve nasal obstruction, which is often caused by a bend in the tissues in the middle of the nose. The current technique for completing a septoplasty involves elevating subperichondrial flaps bilaterally and resecting the deviated portion of cartilage and/or bone. The technique to prevent a septal hematoma by removing the potential dead space after cartilage resection has evolved over time. Traditionally, the nose was packed with petroleum gauze, but using sutures to coapt the mucosa back together has become the preferred method of choice. Placing sutures to reapproximate the mucosa is very effective, but can be challenging, particularly in a narrow nose. The amount of time required varies from 4 to 20 minutes for this part of the surgery, and is potentially associated with its own set of complications. The needle or suture can break, and the lateral nasal wall can be traumatized, leading to formation of scar bands to the septum. Recently, a septal stapler has been developed that uses bioabsorbable staples. The staples are made of polylactide-co-glycolide (PLG), the same copolymer found in Vicryl sutures. It can provide a more uniform closure, is able to reach the posterior septum and could lead to a significant time savings in the operating room. The stapler has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, and required less than a minute to apply in most studied cases. The amount of time saved in the operating room has not yet been studied.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Nasal Obstruction

Interventions

Septal StaplerDEVICE

This device is a stapler designed to place resorbable implants into the nasal septum. Each device contains 8 staples.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * primary septoplasty * age\>18 * septal deviation * ability to read and communicate in English * absence of allergic rhinitis * non-smoker Exclusion Criteria: * revision septoplasty * age \<18 * concurrent sinusitis or endoscopic sinus surgery * existing nasal septal perforation * smoker * diabetes mellitus * allergy to polylactide-co-glycolide (PLG) * non-English speaker

Locations (1)

Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Operative Time

The primary outomce of this study is to determine if time is saved in the operating room by using the septal stapler instead of suture.

Time frame: 1 day

Secondary Outcomes

Subjective Function

The subjective outcome of patients undergoing closure with the septal stapler versus suture will be assessed via the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire. The NOSE questionnaire rates a patient's symptoms using a 0-4 scale where 0 is "Not a problem" and 4 is "Severe problem"

Time frame: up to 2 months

Post-operative Complications

The number of post-operative complications (synechiae, septal perforation) assessed at three-week follow-up by a physician.

Time frame: 3 weeks

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.