Evaluation of the CR Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus

Phase 3CompletedNCT01541969

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust100 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. It is hypothesised that the particular pattern of sound stimulation delivered by the device acts to break up patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brain that may be responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. We will also measure brain activity in a subset of participants to determine if the intervention results in changes in brainwave activity.

Tinnitus affects a large number of people in the UK population but is a poorly understood disorder with no form of treatment that benefits everyone. One theory about tinnitus is that it is caused by altered patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brains hearing centres. It is believed that conditions such as hearing loss lead to changes in how areas of the brain responsible for hearing are 'wired up' causing large areas of the brain to fire at the same time; this is believed to be a mechanism responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. Research suggests that this type of synchronous activity may be interrupted by presenting very specific sequences of sounds to the ears over several months. If sound stimulation can be used to break up patterns of synchronous activity in the hearing brain, then it is argued that it should also be effective in treating tinnitus. The German company ANM have patented a very specific algorithm of sound simulation that is delivered via headphones from a pocket-sized device. This treatment is currently being marketed by the private healthcare sector in Germany and very recently in the UK. The purpose of this study is to independently test the effects of this new therapy on tinnitus severity and related brain activity. We will gather information using questionnaires and listening tests, and make recording of electrical brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Conditions

Tinnitus

Interventions

CR NeuromodulationDEVICE

Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation. The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.

Tinnitus maskingDEVICE

The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Pure tone average \<60 dB HL in the ear where tinnitus is perceived * Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device * Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months * Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz * At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory * Willing to wear the device for 4-6 hours daily during the trial * Sufficient command of English language to read, understand and complete the questionnaires * Able and willing to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Objective tinnitus, Meniere's disease, craniomandibular induced Tinnitus * Pulsatile tinnitus * Intermittent tinnitus * Severe anxiety * Severe depression * Catastrophic tinnitus * Hearing-aids wearers for less than 9 months * Hearing-aid wearers with audiological adjustments within last 3 months * Absolute thresholds \> 70 dB on individual frequencies up to 8 kHz (unable to sufficiently hear the stimulus) * Taking part in another trial during the last 30 days before study start * The individually tailored training stimulus is uncomfortable or not acceptable to the participant

Locations (2)

University College London Ear Institute

London, United Kingdom

NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham

Nottingham, United Kingdom

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)

Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

Secondary Outcomes

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)

Change in the global score on a 25 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)

Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)

The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of health related quality of life. Outcome was measured as a change on Question 1: 'How would you rate your quality of life (over the past 4 weeks)?' There are 5 response options (Very poor=1; Poor=2; Neither poor nor good=3; Good=4; Very good=5). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction in self-perceived quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Oscillatory Power in the Delta Brainwave Pattern as Measured by Electroencephalography (EEG)

Non-invasive recording to measure rhythmic patterns of spontaneous brain activity at rest. An a priori hypothesis targeted normalized delta rhythm. Band powers were calculated as percent change in delta brainwave pattern relative to change in total (1-90 Hz) EEG band. Comparison made between 'visit 2' and 'visit 6'. We used a Neuroscan system (SynAmps2 model 8050, Compumedics Neuroscan, Charlotte, NC, USA) and custom cap with 66 equidistant scalp electrodes (Easycap, GmbH, Germany). A central frontal electrode was used as ground and a nose-tip electrode as reference. Electrode impedances were maintained at 5 kΩ prior to recordings. Recording was done with an offline filter of 0.5 to 200 Hz pass-band and 1 kHz sampling rate. Recording was over a continuous 10-minute period. Participants were seated in a quiet, darkened soundproof booth and were instructed to relax, keep eyes open and fix gaze on a marker point.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.