The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid lowering effect and glucose metabolism in hypercholesterolemia patients with diabetes mellitus.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,049
Atorvastatin 10 mg (atorvastatin 10 mg tablet x 1 or atorvastatin 5 mg tablet x 2), orally,once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in the Japan Atherosclerosis Society \[JAS\] Guidelines \[GL\] after 3 months, had the atorvastatin \[ATV\] dose of 20 mg.)
Rosuvastatin 5 mg (rosuvastatin 5 mg tablet x1 or rosuvastatin 2.5 mg tablet x 2), orally, once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in JAS GL after 3 months, had the rosuvastatin \[RSV\] dose of 10 mg.)
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Level
Time frame: Baseline, and 12 months after administration
Change in HbA1c Level
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months after administration
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment Status
"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months after administration
Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment Status
"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration
Percent Change in 1,5-AG Level
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Change in HbA1c Level
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Percent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hiramitsu Heart Clinic
Nagoya, Aichi Pref., Japan
Honjo Daiichi Hospital
Yurihonjō, Akita Pref., Japan
Iryouhoujin Syadan Yanagisawakai Yanagisawa Iin
Matsudo, Chiba Pref., Japan
Matsuno Medical Clinic
Iyo Gun, Ehime Pref., Japan
Ishite Matsumoto Naika Junkanki Clinic
Matsuyama, Ehime Pref., Japan
Ehime Medical CO OP Izumigawa Clinic
Niihama, Ehime Pref., Japan
Fukui Chuoh Clinic
Fukui, Fukui Pref., Japan
Fukuoka City Medical Association Hospital
Fukuoka, Fukuoka Pref., Japan
Matsumoto Clinic
Fukuoka, Fukuoka Pref., Japan
Saku Hospital
Fukuoka, Fukuoka Pref., Japan
...and 123 more locations
Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Percent Change in Insulin Level
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Change From Baseline in Insulin Level
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Frequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)
Time frame: From the start of the treatment to the end of study treatment
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Percent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Percent Change in Non-HDL-C Level
Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Percent Changes in Lipids and Inflammatory Marker (Hs-CRP) and Their Correlation
Correlation between percent changes in lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TC and FFA) and inflammatory marker (hs-CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Rate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007
Percentage of participants achieving the target LDL-C levels \<100 mg/dL for participants with history of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and \<120 mg/dL for participants without history of CAD are presented.
Time frame: 3 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Change From Baseline in 1,5-AG Level
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)