The purpose of this study is to determine if everolimus combined with reduced exposure CNI (TAC) is efficacious and safe and will support corticosteroid elimination compared to a standard exposure CNI (TAC) + MMF + steroid regimen after paediatric kidney transplantation. An additional purpose of the study is to assess the effect of the combination of EVR and reduced exposure CNI (TAC) on renal function. This study is part of the requirements of the Paediatric Investigational Plan approved by Paediatric Committee at the European Medicines Agency (PDCO/EMA) on September 10, 2010, and is intended to support the indication of everolimus in the prevention of acute rejection in paediatric recipients of a renal transplant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
106
Everolimus (C0 trough level of 3-8 ng/mL) in combination with reduced dose tacrolimus and steroids withdrawal at 6 months after transplant
MMF (Cellcept®): 600mg/m2/dose twice daily (1200 mg/m2/day) in combination with tacrolimus (Prograf) and standard dose steroids
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Fe, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Number of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection
To estimate the rate of the composite efficacy endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death at 12 months post transplantation in primary paediatric kidney transplant recipients converted at 4-6 weeks post-transplantation from MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids, to everolimus + reduced dose TAC regimen and steroid withdrawal at 6 months, versus continuation of MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids.
Time frame: 12 months, 36 months
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 36
To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (abbreviated) (Schwartz, 2009).
Time frame: 12 months and 36 months post-transplantation
Composite Efficacy Endpoint
To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death. The efficacy events will be descriptively summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
To Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)
T-cell mediated rejection severity : Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)
Time frame: month 12, month 36
To Evaluate the Time to Event of BPAR
Time to incidence of Event, given in terms of number of participants with an Event according to time interval up to 36 months
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.
To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: biopsy proven antibody mediated rejection/Steroid resistant BPAR and BPAR treated with T cell depleting therapy.
Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy
To evaluate the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, IF/TA) by histopathology and its progression.The term chronic allograft nephropathy was used inappropriately in the protocol and therefore, replaced by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy
Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation.
Proteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)
The urinary protein/creatinine ratio will be descriptively summarized by treatment group at each visit. The incidence rate of patients with proteinuria will be categorized in \<0.2 g/mg/mg, 0.2\<2.0 mg/mg and ≥ 2.0 mg/mg and summarized by treatment groups at each visit.
Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation
Growth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From Baseline
Evaluation of the potential effects upon the bone growth. The Z-score is a statistical tool which helps to assess data (here child growth parameters) relative to a reference or standard population. The Z-score describes the distance and direction of an observation away from the population median (or mean, however, here the median was used). A negative Z-score shows that data are lower than the median of the standard population, a positive Z-score shows that data are higher than the median of the standard population, and a Z-score of zero shows that the data are equal to the median of the standard population. The more the Z-score is distant from 0, the more expressed is for example underweight or overweight.
Time frame: month 12 , month 36 post transplantation.
Evaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Time
results given as eGFR values by time interval
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months , 24 months, 36 months
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 12
To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (extended) (Schwartz, 2009). Results given as change from randomization
Time frame: 12 months post-transplantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Bron, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, France
...and 21 more locations