The purpose of this study is to evaluate hormone dynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of TAP-144-SR(6M) against TAP-144-SR(3M) in prostate cancer patients previously treated with hormonal therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Unnamed facility
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unnamed facility
Chiba, Chiba, Japan
Unnamed facility
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
Unnamed facility
The Rate of Suppression of Serum Testosterone to Castrate Level
Comparison of the proportion of patients maintained at castration level (≤100 ng/dL)
Time frame: From the start of study drug administration through Week 48
Time Course of Changes in Serum Testosterone
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Time Course of Changes in Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Time Course of Changes in Serum Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Time Course of Change Rate in Serum PSA (FAS)
Evaluation according to the "Criteria for therapeutic effect" from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by prostate-specific antigen \[PSA\])
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
The Maximum Rate of Change in PSA Suppression (FAS)
Evaluation according to the "Criteria for therapeutic effect" from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by PSA)
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Progression by PSA (FAS)
Evaluation according to the "Criteria for therapeutic effect" from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by PSA)
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
Unnamed facility
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Unnamed facility
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, Japan
Unnamed facility
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Unnamed facility
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Unnamed facility
Nigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
Unnamed facility
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
...and 6 more locations
Soft Tissue Response
Assessment in accordance with the "criteria for therapeutic effect" from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition. Soft tissue response was evaluated in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: At week 48
Bone Lesion Response
Partially revised assessment based on the "criteria for therapeutic effect" from the General Rule for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Prostate Canter, 4th edition. Response is measured using bone scintigraphy. Increase in new (2 or more) bone lesion is considered as progression
Time frame: At Week 48
Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
12-lead ECG
Time frame: At 1 hour, week 24, and week 48 after administration