Many patients with cervical disc disease have long-lasting and complex symptoms with chronic pain, low levels of physical and psychological function and sick-leave. Surgery on a few segmental levels might be expected to solve the disc-specific pain but not the non-specific neck pain and the patients'illness. As much as 2/3 of the patients have been reported to have remaining physical/ psychological disability long-term after surgery. A structured physiotherapy programme after surgery may improve patients'function and return to work. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate what a well structured rehabilitation program adds to the customary treatment after surgery for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease in respect to function, disability, workability and cost effectiveness. The study is a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study, with an independent and blinded investigator comparing two alternatives of rehabilitation. 200 patients in working age, with cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression will be included after informed consent. After inclusion in the study patients will be randomised to one out of the two alternatives of physiotherapy, (A) customary treatment (information/ advice on the specialist clinic) or (A+B) active physiotherapy; standardised and structured program of neck specific exercises combined with a behavioural approach plus customary treatment. Patients will be evaluated both clinically and with questionnaires before surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Main outcome variable are neck specific disability. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated. The inclusion will preliminary be closed 2012. The study could contribute to a better clinical decision making, a better health care which will reduce physical, mental and social costs for the patients, and improve the rates of patients returning to and staying at work.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
202
The staff at the Neurosurgical clinic will give the patient ordinary pre- and postoperative information. The physiotherapist at the Neurosurgical clinic informs the patients what to avoid the first weeks after surgery and the importance of a good posture and ergonomic thinking in daily life. The patient is also instructed how to do exercises for the shoulder range of motion. Patients have ordinary post-surgery visit to the surgeon and to the physiotherapist about 6 weeks after the surgery, where physiotherapist instructs the patient in exercises for active neck range of motion.
The behavioural medicine program includes functional behavioural analysis of the problem, medical exercise therapy, strategies to increase self-efficacy in activities and problem-solving strategies for coping with disability.
Department of Medical and Health Sciences
Linköping, Östergötland County, Sweden
Linköping University
Linköping, Östergötland County, Sweden
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
NDI will be measured at baseline before surgical intervention. Change from baseline in NDI will be measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. NDI will be used to investigate Neck specific disability. The 10 sections in the questionnaire are rated on a six-point scale (0-5 point). The scores for all sections are added together and transformed to percentages (where 0% is no pain or difficulties and 100% is highest score for pain and difficulty on all items.
Time frame: Baseline and change after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measures is going to report a change over time.
Pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100mm)
Pain intensity of neck pain, arm pain and headache, respectively
Time frame: The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100mm
Dizziness/ unsteadiness measured on a VAS-scale (0=no problems, 100= pretty severe problems).
Time frame: The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Modified Odom scale and a question if how important the change is.
A 1 to 6 point scale of treatment outcome. 1=recovered, 2=much better, 3=better, 4=unchanged, 5=worse, 6= much worse. How important is the change on a 0 to 10 point horizontal scale (0=not at all important, 10= very important).
Time frame: The outcome measure is going to report a change over time from before surgery to 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
Expectations of treatment fulfilled
Fulfillment of the expectations for surgery at follow-ups was measured on a four-grade scale (1=yes, completely; 2=yes, partially; 3=no, not at all; or 4= do not know).
Time frame: The outcome measure is going to report a change from 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
Background data
Pain history, pain debute, pain duration, pain medication, other diseases and problems than from the neck, age, sex, smoking, family and social life, expectations of the treatment, care seeking, type of work
Time frame: Mainly before treatment started. Some basic background data are also asked at the follow-ups at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to control for variations over time.
Vocational situation
Questionns about sick-leave, ergonomics, expectations of being able to work in 6 months, work ability index
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Pain-drawing
Character of pain, number of pain localisation and distributions of symptoms
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Zung questionnaire
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
MSPQ questionnaire
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Distress and risk assessment method (DRAM)
Zung and MSPQ questionnaires will be combined in the DRAM instrument
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Work Ability Index
Time frame: Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Physical activity/ exercise habits
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Symptom satisfaction
How patients would feel about having their current neck symptoms for the rest of their lives was rated on a seven grade scale (1= delighted, 7=terrible).
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Pain frequency and pain medication
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Self-efficacy scale
"People´s beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence overe events that affect their lives" Self efficacy (Altmaier) is a 20 item, 11 point scale (0=not at all confident, 10=completely confident).
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Question about re-surgery
Descriptive data
Time frame: Before intervention and at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
EuroQuol five dimensions self report (EQ-5D) and EuroQuol thermometer
Health realted quality of life
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version (MPI-S), MPI-S significant others and open questions
Relationship and support from spouses
Time frame: Before intervention and at 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Neurological status
Questions of numbness and tinglings in the arm and hand and pain distribution. Clinical examination: sensibility, reflexes, motor function.
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Physical clinical outcome measures
Range of motion in the neck, head repositioning accuracy (cervical kinesteshia), hand strength, balance (sharpened Romberg, walking in a figure of eight), neck muscle endurance
Time frame: Before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time.
Patients income
Will be used for health echonomic calculations
Time frame: At baseline and at 1 and 2 years follow up. The outcome is going to report a change over time
Copy of the sick-leave receipt from the surgeon
Copy of the sickness certificate written by the physician. The certificate will be analysed due to quality with the emphasis on how the cervical radiculopathy impact on function and work ability and due to the quality of sickness certificate in relation to Swedish insurance office rules.
Time frame: After surgery (baseline, before physiotherapy started)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.